My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 12:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/21/2010 6:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/25/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 6.1 F <br /> Page 21 <br /> Grand Jur Res onse <br /> Y P <br /> Page 4 , <br /> , <br /> Law Enforcement <br /> 1. The most effective preventative measure against sexual offenders is making <br /> regularly scheduled and random contact, plus ongoing observafion. <br /> Response: Respondent agrees with the finding. However, we also agree the GPS <br /> monitoring of all sex offenders is increasingly becoming the most effective <br /> monitoring strategy. The legality of GPS monitoring of sexual offenders not on <br /> Parole or Probation, is yet to be settled in the Courts. <br /> 2. Due to fhe econom as well a <br /> y s State budgef reductions, the San Mafeo County <br /> Board of Supervisors has had to reduce all depa►tment budgets, including law <br /> enforcement. <br /> Response: Respondent agrees with the finding. <br /> 3. Sex offenders re-offend at a rate of 50 % or more. !n the past, the SherifPs O�ce <br /> and all local !aw enforcement agencies ac�ively monitored San Mafeo County's <br /> offenders. Due to budget cuts, this activity has diminished and dedicated sex <br /> unit personnel have been rolled into general investigations. <br /> Response: Respondent agrees with the finding. <br /> 4. Consistent and intensive monftoring of convicted sex offenders when releasec! by <br /> parole/probation is performed inconsistently throughouf San Mateo Counfy. <br /> Some city police depar�ments have extensive proeedures in place to monitor sex <br /> offenders while others perform the minimum required by law. <br /> Response: Respondent agrees with the finding. <br /> 5. There is insufficient sharing and coordination of information about sexual <br /> offenders among law enforcement agencies within the County. <br /> Respondent disagrees wholly with the findings. We believe coordination, <br /> cooperation and sharing among the Sheriff's �ffice, Probation, District Attorney's <br /> Office and local law enforcement agencies within San Ma#eo County may be the <br /> best anywhere in the State of California. These agencies have been working <br /> together and sharing information for decades. In San Mateo County, we pride <br /> ourselves in our ability to coordinate information quickly and effectively both in <br /> person and through the use of our technology. Our communication success starts <br /> with the San Mateo County Police Chiefs and Sheriff Association, which drives the <br /> regional cooperation through many County-wide protocols such as Child Abduction <br /> and Children's Sexual Abuse po(icies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.