Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 6.1 F <br /> Page 2 <br /> ��•��. Superior Court of San Mateo County <br /> �� HaII of justice and Records <br /> , i 400 County Centex <br /> � • � Itedwood CiCy, CA 94063-�655 <br /> �ff i►��� <br /> John C. Fitton <br /> Court Executive Officex (650) 599-1200 <br /> C1erk & Jury Commissioner PAX (b50) 363-4698 <br /> p ���D�1C� <br /> July 14, 2010 .�U� X 9 2 ��0 <br /> crn� oF A�dw000 c�rir <br /> c �� tc <br /> City Council � � � � � �° � � � � � � ,� ,� � � <br /> City of Redwood City � � � � � � - T � � � � � � � �' <br /> 1017 Middlefield Road � � � � ,� $ � <br /> Redwo�d City, CA 94063 �� �� I ,' <br /> I <br /> Re: Sex Offender Law Enforcement in San Mateo Caunty I i I � <br /> Dear Councilmembcrs: �� <br /> Thc 2009-20I0 G�rand Jury filed a report on July 14, 2010 which contains £ndings and reco�nmendations pertaining <br /> to your agency. Your agency must submit comments, witl�in 90 days, to the I�on. Ciifford V. Cretan. Your <br /> agency's response is due no later than October 12, 201Q. Please note that the response should indicate that it <br /> was approved by yaur governing budy at a public meeting. <br /> For a)1 f�ndings, yovr responding agency shall indicate one of the following: <br /> 1. The respondent agrees with the fiading, <br /> 2. The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the findin�, in which case the response shall specify <br /> the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall incIude an explanation of the reasons therefore. <br /> I Additionaily, as to each Grand Jury recommendation, your responding agency shali report one of the foIlowing <br /> actions: <br /> 1. The reconunendation has heen implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented ackion. <br /> 2. The recommendafion has not yet been implernented, but will be implemented in the future, with a <br /> titne frame for implementation <br /> 3. The recom�mendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of <br /> an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter w be prepared for discussion by the afficer or <br /> director ofthe agency or depariment being investigated or reviewcd, inelud�ng the governing body of <br /> Ehe public agency when applicable. This time frame shat[ not exceed six months from the date of <br /> publication of the Grand Jury report. <br /> 4. The recormnendation will not be implemented because it is nat warranted or reasanable, with an <br /> explanaEion therefore. <br />