My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-04-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:33:19 PM
Creation date
4/10/2003 11:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/14/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f4 2 ? <br />MEMORANDUM <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES <br />Engineering & Construction <br />To: Bruce Liedstrand Date: April 3, 2003 <br />Community Development Services Director <br />From: Brian Lee, Senior Civil Engineer <br />Re: Impacts to Cinema/Retail /Parking Garage Project based on Nick <br />Watry's Proposal Options <br />A. Proposal Option 1 - One Level Underground Parking Garage (504 Stalls) <br />1. Entrance on Theatre Way/Winslow would impact future development <br />plans for Block 2. <br />2. Constructing an entrance on Theatre Way/Winslow would conflict <br />with re- aligning the box culvert when Block 2 is developed. <br />3. If an underground garage was to extend beneath Broadway, there <br />would be major disruption (up to one year) to the businesses on this <br />portion of Broadway during the relocation of utilities, shoring, building <br />the garage, and then reconstructing the roadway. <br />4. There would be additional time required for redesigning the garage, <br />retail /cinema and utilities. This would take at least 6 months or more. <br />5. Option 1 only provides 504 parking spaces. In accordance with the <br />DDA and other agreements approximately 590 spaces are required. <br />6. If the design of the garage substantially changes from the originally <br />EIR, then an amended EIR may be necessary. Staff believes that <br />extending the garage beneath Broadway would be a significant <br />change. <br />7. The proposed relocation by Watry of the box culvert further west <br />under Option 1 will not provide adequate slope for storm drainage, <br />and will not provide capacity for a 100 -year storm. <br />8. There would be impact and disruption to PG &E and PacBell services. <br />More than likely power, gas and telephone lines would have to be <br />relocated. This would add additional time for private utilities to <br />relocate their facilities. <br />-I- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.