My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-05-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-05-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:28:22 PM
Creation date
5/1/2003 1:49:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/5/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
qA3 <br />LEAGUE PRESIDENT TESTIFIES ON STRUCTURAL REFORM FOR <br />ASSEMBLY COMMISSION <br />League President John Russo, City Attorney of <br />Oakland, presented the League's recommendations <br />for structural reforms of the state budget at an April <br />23 hearing in the State Capitol. <br />The hearing was sponsored by the Assembly <br />Commission on Structural Challenges to Budgeting <br />in California, organized by Assembly Speaker Herb <br />Wesson. Assembly Member Dave Cox serves as <br />Vice Chair. <br />The commission was also addressed by a <br />bipartisan group of Assembly Members who have <br />been working on structural reform issues, including <br />Simon Salinas, Keith Richman, Sharon Runner, <br />John Campbell, and Joe Canciamilla. Other <br />testifiers were: Jean Ross of the California Budget <br />Project, Fred Main of the California Chamber of <br />Commerce, and Ted Smith of the California State <br />Association of Counties. <br />Mr. Russo emphasized the importance of basing <br />any reform of the state budget structure on some <br />principles and values of sound budget management, <br />including the following: <br />Transparency and Competency. Assure <br />Californians their state budget is being well managed <br />in. an open and professional manner. <br />Fiscal Discipline. Achieve improved fiscal <br />predictability and control. <br />• Invest and Stabilize. Make long -term <br />capital investments; avoid dramatic swings in <br />spending or taxation; and only carryover operating <br />deficits from year to year on a short-term, emer- <br />gency basis. <br />Intergovemmental Accountability. Re- <br />sponsibility for financing state government services <br />should not be directly or indirectly shifted to local <br />governments. Give local governments broad rev- <br />enues options. <br />He followed with these specific recommenda- <br />tions: <br />1. Build A Firewall Between State and Local <br />Budgets. Whether it is deferring mandate reim- <br />bursements, raising local cost -share percentages or <br />directly appropriating funds historically dedicated to <br />local services, the state needs to quit looking at local <br />treasuries as the way to balance the state budget. <br />This practice undermines basic concepts of ac- <br />countability and fairness, but more importantly, it <br />weakens our most important democratic institutions <br />by limiting their ability to respond to citizen needs and <br />set community priorities. If something is good <br />enough for the state to order a local government to <br />do it the state should pay for it entirely and promptly, <br />or the law should be repealed or never enacted in the <br />first place. This is best done Constitutionally. <br />2. Two -Year Budget; Prudent Reserve. <br />Most fiscal experts advise that governments have <br />mull-year revenue and expenditure forecasts to <br />better predict the long -term consequences of today s <br />budget and tax cut decisions. California desperately <br />needs to take a long -tens view of this type, perhaps <br />through the type of process provided for in AB 499 <br />(Canciamilla) or some other multi-year process. In <br />fact, state legislators should be demanding long- <br />term analyses and forecasts of their decisions and <br />the revenue and expenditure trends facing the state. <br />Moreover, a requirement for a prudent reserve (see <br />AB 498 (Canciamilla) is absolutely necessary in <br />order to help meet short term cash needs (in lieu of <br />short-tern borrowing) and to deal with the inevitable <br />downturn in economic cycles. <br />3. A Balanced Budget Based on Consensus <br />Estimates. We either need to be honest with the <br />California public that we don't necessarily adopt a <br />balanced budget (the constitution only requires that <br />the Governor propose one) or we need to set the <br />requirement into law and live with them. A separately <br />elected official, such as the State Controller, should <br />be delegated responsibility to independently verify <br />that the budget is based on a reasonable balance of <br />estimated revenues and expenditures. Moreover, the <br />Department of Finance and LAO should be required <br />to reach consensus on the final estimates on which <br />the adopted budget is based. <br />4. Use Incentives and Enforce Balance. In <br />most private and public corporations the CEO is <br />ultimately responsible for compliance with the budget <br />Continued on Pape 10 <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site••www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.