My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-05-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-05-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:28:22 PM
Creation date
5/1/2003 1:49:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/5/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q.A -11 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />as well as to consolidate this program with related <br />historical preservation services provided through <br />the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The <br />Main Street Program has been a successful <br />program from many years providing technical <br />assistance to communities seeking to reinvigorate <br />their historic downtowns, and promoting local <br />economic development. The author is continuing <br />to purse the restoration of budget funds for this <br />popular program. The League supports programs <br />that assist local economic development efforts. If <br />consolidating the Main Street program within the <br />OHP is a means of preserving this popular pro- <br />gram in the current budget environment, then it is <br />worth supporting. Staff. Dan Carrigg, Status: <br />Passed the AsJbEcDev &Ecnmy on April 22nd, will <br />be heard next in Arts April 29th, Position: Sup- <br />port. <br />AB 1426 (Steinberg) Sacramento Region: <br />Affordable Housing Standard. As introduced, AB <br />1426 would create a pilot affordable housing <br />production standard program within Sacramento <br />region. All communities are essentially required to <br />participate in the program and the bill outlines <br />actions communities must take in order to pro- <br />duce more affordable housing. Other provisions <br />of AB 1426 would provide cities that meet the <br />affordable housing production standards with <br />priority status for as yet unspecified grant funds <br />and penalize those communities that fall short of <br />the goals established by the bill. <br />Although the legislation only applies to the <br />Sacramento region, the League remains con- <br />cerned that AB 1426 would establish statewide <br />precedents that could be detrimental to jurisdic- <br />tions beyond the bill's influence. In addition, the <br />bill includes a number of provisions that closely <br />resemble legislation the League is on record <br />opposing, including provisions which would <br />eliminate public hearings for any residential <br />developments or select commercial mixed use <br />projects and allow developers to appeal local land <br />use decisions to the State Tax Credit Allocation <br />Commission. <br />Since last fall, discussions about the develop- <br />ment of an affordable housing standard have been <br />underway in the Sacramento Region. Although <br />this bill is considered to be a "work in progress; a <br />number of affected jurisdictions have recently <br />come out in opposition. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br />Status: Pending in Senate Housing and Commu- <br />nity Development Committee, Position: Watch. <br />A letter outlining the League's concerns has <br />been sent to the author. <br />AB 1268 (Wiggins) Inclusionary Zoning, <br />Urban Growth Boundaries. AB 1268 was re- <br />cently amended to require general plans to identify <br />20 -year urban growth boundaries, beyond which <br />infrastructure services cannot extend. In addition, <br />this legislation would require all jurisdictions to <br />adopt inclusionary zoning by January 2005. This <br />rather extreme proposal conflicts with existing <br />annexation and sphere of influence laws, as well <br />as mandates inclusionary housing statewide. The <br />momentum on this proposal is questionable, <br />however, it is worth paying attention to. Staff Dan <br />Carrigg, Status: Assembly Local Government <br />Committee; Hearing 4/30, Position: Oppose. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />AB 334 (Goldberg). Water Softeners. Cities <br />and other local governments need the authority to <br />regulate water softeners in a way that meets their <br />specific needs and water quality challenges. AB <br />334 would delete restrictions in existing law that <br />limit how cities and counties may regulate water <br />softeners and instead authorize cities to regulate <br />water softeners. Specifically, the bill would autho- <br />rize a city, county, or special district to adopt an <br />ordinance to "limit the availability or use, or prohibit <br />the installation, of water softening or conditioning <br />appliances that discharge to the community sewer <br />system." Self- regenerating water softeners <br />continually discharge salt into public sewer sys- <br />tems, which makes it difficult for waste water <br />systems to meet their NPDES permit require- <br />ments in addition to causing serious environmen- <br />tal and health problems. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.