Laserfiche WebLink
q.A -►2 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />or prohibit the installation, of water softening or <br />conditioning appliances that discharge to the <br />community sewer system." This bill was de- <br />scribed in detail in Priority Focus on April 25. AB <br />334 was passed by the Assembly Environment, <br />Safety and Toxics Committee, and since it is not a <br />fiscal bill now awaits action on the Assembly Floor. <br />Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: SenFlr, Position: <br />Support. <br />AB 1051 (Goldberg). Capital Facilities <br />Fees. AB 1051 clarifies existing law regarding <br />how public municipal utilities charge other public <br />agencies for capital facilities fees. This bill is in <br />response to numerous lawsuits filed by schools <br />and other public agencies regarding utility fees. <br />Cities that have municipal water, sewer, gas or <br />electric utilities should take a close look at <br />AB 1051 which is co- sponsored by the City of <br />San Francisco, the City of Los Angeles and the <br />East Bay Municipal Utility District. The bill passed <br />the Assembly Local Government Committee and <br />is now pending on the Assembly Floor. Staff: <br />Yvonne Hunter; Status: AsFir; Position: Sup- <br />port. <br />bly Housing and Community Development Com- <br />mittee wisely decided to make AB 1160 a two-year <br />bill on April 30. This bill pre -empts local authority <br />in three ways by: (1) imposing numerous restric- <br />tions on local second unit ordinances, (2) reducing <br />parking standards up to 58 percent on density <br />bonus projects, and (3) establishing housing as a <br />Permitted use on all public school sites. The <br />League's successful lobbying effort was aided by <br />the efforts of the League's regional representa- <br />tives in generating phone calls into key members. <br />The League's Peninsula Division also played a key <br />role on the bill by sending a delegation of city <br />officials to testify against the bill at both the As- <br />sembly Local Government and Housing Commit- <br />tee hearings. The Assembly Housing Committee <br />is expected to hold hearings this fall to discern to <br />what extent, if any, the state should intrude on <br />local authority in these areas. In preparation for <br />these discussions, the League will gather informa- <br />tion from cities to provide Committee members <br />with a comprehensive local perspective on these <br />issues. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: Two-year bill, <br />Pending in Assembly Housing and Community <br />Development Committee, Position: Oppose. <br />ACA 10 (Harman). Storm Water Fees. <br />Proposition 218. ACA 10 , strongly supported by <br />the League, would place before the voters a <br />measure to add storm water fees to those types <br />of fees already exempt from the voter approval <br />requirements of Proposition 218. ACA 10 passed <br />the Assembly Local Government Committee this <br />week and will be heard next in the Assembly <br />Elections, Redistricting and Constitutional Amend- <br />ments Committee. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Sta- <br />tus: AsElecRedisBConAm, Position: Support. <br />HOUSING <br />AB 1160 (Steinberg). Second Units /Density <br />Bonuses /Housing on School Sites: Now Two - <br />Year Bill. <br />Thanks to the Leadership of Chairman Alan <br />Lowenthal, and Assembly Members Salinas, <br />Mountjoy, Runner, Cogdill and Kehoe, the Assem- <br />SB 898 (Burton). Farmland Conservation. <br />SB 898 would prevent cities and counties from <br />zoning, rezoning or prezoning any "important <br />cropland" for non - agricultural development until <br />January 2015. <br />This legislation would require cities and coun- <br />ties seeking to utilize "important cropland" for non- <br />agricultural purposes to first demonstrate that the <br />request is accompanied by a specified land use <br />proposal and that the proposed use is consistent <br />with the city or county's general plan. If the non- <br />agricultural development is residential, a specified <br />percentage of units must be low and very low <br />income. Cities would also have to find that the <br />proposed non - agricultural project on "important <br />cropland" does not contribute to further non- <br />agricultural use in the area, prove that the pro- <br />posed use is critical to the long -term economic <br />development of the region and demonstrate that <br />there are no aftemative sites that would provide a <br />PAGE 12 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />