My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-05-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-05-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:27:49 PM
Creation date
5/8/2003 4:36:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
5/12/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q.A -ii <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />AB 872 (Strickland). Vehicles. Speed <br />Limits. Divided Urban Highways. AB 872 <br />allows a local authority, when conducting an <br />engineering and traffic survey for the purpose of <br />establishing a speed limit on an urban, divided, <br />and restricted access arterial highway, to consider <br />residential density, under certain conditions, and <br />pedestrian and bicyclist safety. According to the <br />"Goulet" court decision, speed limits not set within <br />5 mph of the 85th percentile constitute a "speed <br />trap" and are thus ineligible for radar enforcement. <br />The City of Thousand Oaks is the sponsor of the <br />bill. AB 872 passed out of the Assembly Appro- <br />priations Committee on 4/30 /03. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman, Status: AsmFlr, Position: Support <br />AB 972 (Correa). False Claims Act AB 972 <br />would authorize a local government entity to file a <br />civil action under the False Claims Act only if it <br />concludes, as a result of its investigation, that <br />there is a reasonable, good faith belief that a <br />violation of the Act has occurred or is occurring, <br />and that filing the action would not be in retaliation <br />for a contractor's good faith dispute. <br />AB 972 is similar to SB 934 (Margett, 2001) <br />which the League opposed. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman, Status: AsJud; Hrg -5/6, Position: <br />Oppose. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />AB 974 (Nation). Coastal Zone. Archaeo- <br />logical or Paleontological Resources. AB 974 <br />would repeal provisions of the California Coastal <br />Act that require mitigation measures to be taken <br />where development would adversely impact those <br />archaeological or paleontological resources <br />identified by a State Historic Preservation Officer. <br />Instead, the bill would require that Local Coastal <br />Plans contain policies and ordinances to ensure <br />that all feasible measures are taken to avoid <br />negative impacts on archaeological or paleonto- <br />logical resources that have been identified as <br />such by the State Historic Preservation Officer or <br />the Native American Heritage Commission. In <br />addition, AB 974 would protect designated sacred <br />sites or significant Native American Cultural <br />resources against significant disruption. <br />AS 974 was approved by the Assembly Natural <br />Resources Committee this week, and is now <br />pending in the Assembly Appropriations Commit- <br />tee. The League is seeking comments from <br />coastal cities about whether the modifications <br />included in AS 974 are appropriate. Staff: Yvonne <br />Hunter, Status: AsApps, Position: Review and <br />Comment. <br />AB 947 (Jackson). Coastal Erosion. AB 947, <br />among other provisions, would establish a list of <br />general principles of coastal erosion planning and <br />response that state agencies should use to <br />prioritize coastal protection and erosion control <br />projects. This measure passed the Assembly <br />Natural Resources Committee and is pending in <br />the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Inter- <br />ested coastal cities should review all of AB 947 <br />and send their comments to the author and the <br />League. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: AsApps, <br />Position: Review and Comment <br />SB 196 (Kuehl). Regional Water Quality <br />Control Boards. Municipal Members. SB 196 <br />is a League - sponsored bill that would clarify <br />existing law regarding the composition of the <br />state's nine regional water quality control boards. <br />It would provide clarification that the individual <br />appointed to the position of "associated with a <br />municipal government" is a mayor or a city council <br />member. This week, SB 196 by- passed the <br />Senate Appropriations Committee due to lack of <br />fiscal impact and now awaits action on the <br />Senate Floor. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: <br />SenFlr, Position: Support/Sponsor. <br />AB 334 (Goldberg). Water Softeners. AB 334 <br />would once again permit cities to regulate water <br />softeners. It would delete restrictions in existing <br />law that limit how cities and counties may regulate <br />water softeners and instead authorize cities to <br />regulate water softeners. Specifically, the bill <br />would authorize a city, county, or special district to <br />adopt an ordinance to "limit the availability or use, <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.