Laserfiche WebLink
4-A-14 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />would establish statewide precedents that could be <br />detrimental to jurisdictions beyond the bill's osten- <br />sible influence. In addition, the penalties in the bill <br />mirror provisions in other legislation the League is <br />currently opposing. This measure will be considered <br />for a formal League position at the League's Commit- <br />tee on Housing, Community and Economic Develop- <br />ment on June 27th. A letter outlining the League's <br />concerns has been sent to the author, and is avail- <br />able from the League's website. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br />Status: AsApps, Position: Review and Comment. <br />AB 1358 (Simitian). Housing Efficiency Act. AB <br />1358 allows redevelopment funds to be used to <br />support the development of affordable housing within <br />five miles of the boundaries of the project area. <br />Adjacent cities and counties would also be permitted <br />to jointly fund the development of affordable housing <br />less than five miles away from the project area, or <br />within five miles of a redevelopment agency. Finally, <br />AB 1358 recognizes the unique challenges that built <br />out communities face when considering new con- <br />struction. If a community can demonstrate that at <br />least 85% of residentially -zoned land contains <br />housing at or above the minimum allowed density, <br />these cities are permitted to provide funding to an <br />adjacent community for projects that will be located <br />within five miles of the built -out city's boundary. <br />Redevelopment funds are an important source of <br />funding for a variety of community revitalization <br />purposes, including securing land, improving existing <br />structures and subsidizing housing. AB 1358 pro- <br />vides local communities with additional flexibility to <br />use redevelopment funds more efficiently, combine <br />resources and to respond to the market opportunities <br />that are not necessarily governed by jurisdictional <br />boundaries. In brief, this additional flexibility will <br />assist local agencies when they work with adjacent <br />jurisdictions build more affordable housing. This <br />legislation is sponsored by cities in the author's <br />district. The measure narrowly passed the Assembly <br />Housing Committee on Wednesday, after encounter- <br />ing opposition from housing advocates. Cities <br />supporting this concept are encouraged to send <br />letters. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: AsmFIr, Position: <br />Support. <br />SB 293 (Brulte). Development Fees. SB 293 <br />prevents local agencies from imposing a monetary <br />charge or exaction on development or construction <br />activities for the purpose of raising in general fund <br />revenue. This bill was described in more detail in last <br />week's Priority Focus. Based upon opposition from <br />local governments, the author agreed to make 52 <br />293 a two-year bill before the Senate Local Govern- <br />ment Committee on Wednesday. Given that this <br />legislation seeks to limit local taxing authority League <br />will continue to monitor its progress over the coming <br />months. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: Two -year bill. <br />AsHlth, Position: Oppose. <br />SB 898 (Burton). Farmland Conservation. SB <br />M would prevent cities and counties from zoning, <br />rezoning or prezoning any "important cropland" for <br />non - agricultural development until January 2015. An <br />in -depth discussion of the bill can be found in last <br />week's Priority Focus. On Wednesday, the Senate <br />Local Government Committee gutted the language of <br />the bill and replaced it with intent language. A farm- <br />land conservation working group will now be formed. <br />The League will continue to be involved in the upcom- <br />ing discussions. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: SenFlr, <br />Position: Review and Comment. <br />AB 170 (Reyes) General Plans. San Joaquin Air <br />Quality District. Several days ago AB 170 was <br />converted from a nursing bill into a legislation that <br />establishes significant mandates upon the local <br />governments within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin <br />Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). <br />Affected agencies were taken by surprise, and given <br />little time to comment on AB 170 The League <br />opposed the bill based upon the significant mandates <br />on the affected local governments. AB 170 was <br />heard before the Assembly Local Government <br />Committee on Wednesday May 7. The author agreed <br />to replace the substance of the bill in its current form <br />with a set of amendments that inject air quality consid- <br />erations into the general plan process in a more <br />balanced and reasonable manner. The League <br />plans to review the drafted language as soon as it <br />becomes available. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: <br />AsmFlr Position: Review and Comment. <br />SB 744 (Dunn). Housing Accountability Commit- <br />tee. Cities need to be on record opposing this <br />legislation which would permit housing developers to <br />appeal any condition that is imposed on an approved <br />PAGE 141PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />