My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res60 2984
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1960-1969 partial
>
1960
>
Res60 2984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2010 3:05:01 PM
Creation date
11/8/2010 3:05:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/15/1960
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hall of Justice and Records, Redwood City, California <br /> as the day, hour, and place when and where any and all <br /> persons having any objections to the proposed work and improve- <br /> ments described in said Resolution ^f Intention No.2957, or to <br /> the grades at which said work and improvements are to be done and <br /> made, or to the district to be assessed for said work and improve- <br /> ments, could appear before said Council and show cause why said <br /> proposed work and improvements should not be carried out and done <br /> in accordance with said Resolution of Intention No.2957 , or why <br /> said work and improvements should not be carried out and done at <br /> the grades as shown on the plans, profiles and detailed drawings <br /> referred to in said Resolution of Intention No.2957 and now on <br /> file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Redwood City; and <br /> WHEREAS, at the day, hour, and place last above mentioned, <br /> all objections, oral and written, to said work and improvements <br /> described in said Resolution of Intention No. x '95'7, or to the <br /> extent of the district to be assessed therefor, were duly con- <br /> sidered by said Council; and <br /> WHEREAS all said objections were overruled and denied by <br /> said Council; and <br /> WHEREAS said Council did determine that protests were not <br /> made by more than one half (1/2) of the owners of the property <br /> proposed to be assessed for said work and improvements; and <br /> WHEREAS said Council has acquired jurisdiction to order said <br /> work and improvements; <br /> -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.