My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res10 15067
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Res10 15067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2011 4:57:44 PM
Creation date
12/7/2010 4:26:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/6/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/06/2010 <br />Step 1f: Calculate the Base /Seasonal Allocation Cutback Percentage for each <br />agency by dividing its Base /Seasonal Allocation by the agency's Total <br />Production, and <br />- Step 1g: Calculate the Base /Seasonal Purchase Cutback Percentage by <br />multiplying the Base /Seasonal Allocation Cutback percentage times the lesser of: <br />(a) the immediately preceding SFPUC purchases or (b) ISG, adjusting the <br />Seasonal percentage above until the total reduction equals the Overall Average <br />Wholesale Customer Reduction. <br />Additionally, adjustments to the Base Component for Stanford University will be made <br />to remove that two week time period that the University is completely closed during <br />the winter break per policy set by the University President as long as that policy <br />remains in place. This adjustment will be removed at such time as the seasonal closure <br />policy is terminated by Stanford University. <br />Section 2.2.2 Step Two: First Adjustment for San Tose and Santa Clara The resulting <br />Base/ Seasonal Purchase Cutback Percentage in Section 2.2.1 for San Jose and Santa <br />Clara will be compared to the highest Base /Seasonal Purchase Cutback percentage of <br />the other Wholesale Customers. If both San Jose's and Santa Clara's percentage <br />reductions are larger than the highest percentage reduction among any other Wholesale <br />Customers, the Base /Seasonal Purchase Cutback percentage established under Section <br />2.2.1 will remain unchanged. If either San Jose's percentage cutback or Santa Clara's <br />percentage cutback, or both, is smaller than the highest Base /Seasonal Purchase <br />Cutback percentage of other Wholesale Customers, the Base /Seasonal Allocation (in <br />mgd) of San Jose or Santa Clara, or both, will be reduced so that the percentage cutback <br />of each is no smaller than that of the Wholesale Customers' otherwise highest <br />percentage cutback. The amount of shortage allocation (in mgd) removed from San Jose <br />and /or Santa Clara will be reallocated among the remaining Wholesale Customers in <br />proportion to the Base /Seasonal Allocation of each. <br />Section 2.2.3 Step Three: Determination of Weighted Purchase Cutback For Each <br />Wholesale Customer Each agency's weighted allocation is calculated by multiplying <br />its Adjusted Base /Seasonal Allocation in Section 2.2.2 by 66.66% and its .Fixed <br />Component by 33.33 %. The Fixed Component is (i) the Wholesale Customer's ISG <br />provided for in the Agreement, or (ii) in the case of Hayward, 25.11 mgd, or (iii) in the <br />case of San Jose and Santa Clara, consistent with the limit on purchases from SFPUC set <br />forth in Section 4.05 of the Agreement, e. g., 4.5 mgd each. The amount of the Fixed <br />Component for each Wholesale Customer is shown on Table 1. <br />Section 2.2.4 Step Four: Second Adjustment for San Tose and Santa Clara The <br />resulting Weighted Allocations for San Jose and Santa Clara will be compared to the <br />highest Weighted Purchase Cutback, shown as a percentage, of the other Wholesale <br />Customers. If both San Jose's and Santa Clara's percentage cutback is larger than the <br />highest percentage cutback among other Wholesale Customers, the Weighted Purchase <br />Cutbacks established under Section 2.2.3 will remain unchanged. If either San Jose's <br />-3- 2560014.1 <br />#15067 <br />MUFF # 802 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.