My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res10 15067
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Res10 15067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2011 4:57:44 PM
Creation date
12/7/2010 4:26:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/6/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/06/2010 <br />percentage cutback or Santa Clara's percentage cutback, or both, is smaller than the <br />highest percentage cutback of any other Wholesale Customers, the Weighted Shortage <br />Allocation (in mgd) of San Jose or Santa Clara, or both, will be reduced so that the <br />percentage reduction of each is no smaller than that of the Wholesale Customers' <br />otherwise highest Weighted Percentage Cutback. The amount of allocation (in mgd) <br />removed from San Jose and/or Santa Clara will be reallocated among the remaining <br />Wholesale Customers in proportion to the Weighted Shortage Allocation of each. <br />Section 2.2.5 Step Five: Adjustment for Minimum and Maximum. Cutbacks. Using <br />the Adjusted Weighted Purchase Cutbacks, either a 10% minimum cutback or <br />maximum cutback, as defined below, is applied to any agency whose Adjusted <br />Weighted Purchase Cutback falls outside this range: <br />- A minimum 10% cutback is applied to the individual agency Adjusted Weighted <br />Allocation, with the reapportioned water being placed in the hardship bank for <br />allocation to East Palo Alto. <br />A maximum cutback of the average cutback plus 20% (e,g.15% average cutback <br />results in a maximum cutback of 15% + 20% = 35 %) is applied to the individual <br />agency Adjusted Weighted Allocation, with the water necessary to meet that <br />level being subtracted in proportion to each Wholesale Customer's Adjusted <br />Weighted Allocation from all remaining agencies, except those at agencies <br />subject to the minimum cutback above. <br />The result is the Adjusted Minimum / Maximum Purchase Cutback, expressed as a <br />percentage. <br />Section 2.2.6 Step Six: Adjustment to Provide Sufficient Supply for East Palo Alto <br />In order to provide for sufficient water supply for water customers served by the City of <br />East Palo Alto (EPA), the maximum Final Purchase Cutback applied at any given time <br />to EPA will be equal to 50% of the Overall Average Wholesale Customer Reduction. <br />The water needed to accormnodate the guaranteed maximum cutback to EPA will be <br />provided in two ways: <br />- First, water from the hardship bank provided by the 10% minimum cutback will <br />be first added to the EPA Adjusted Weighted Purchase Allocation, and <br />Second, the balance of water needed for EPA will be deducted on a prorated <br />basis from those agencies with a pre- drought residential per capita water use <br />greater than 55 gallons per capita per day (as documented in the most recent <br />BAWSCA Annual Survey) in proportion to each agency's Min. /Max. Adjusted <br />Allocation and who are not subject to the minimum and maximum reductions <br />already applied per Section 2.2.5 <br />The result is the Allocation with EPA Adjustment, expressed as an mgd. <br />-4- 2560M.1 <br />#15067 <br />MUFF # 802 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.