Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br /> MITIGATION MONITORING CHECK�IST-- CITY n[1WNT[1WN PRFrICF PI er� <br /> .. <br /> The environmental mitigation measures lisied in column two below have been incorporated into lhe condilions of approval for the Redwood City Downtown Precise Plan in order to mitigate idenlified environmental <br /> impacts. A compieled and signed chart wiil indica[e lhat each mitigalion requirement has been complied with, and that Cily and stale monitoring requiremenls have been (ulfilled wilh respect to Public Resources Code <br /> seclion 21081.8. ' <br /> MONIT�RING VERIFICATION <br /> IDEN7IFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementalion Moiiitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Performance Criteria Entit Veriflcation Entit Re uirements <br /> CULTURAL AND HISTORIC <br /> RESOURCES <br /> Impact 7-1: Impacts on Mitigation 7-1. Implementation of the City; individual City During project- <br /> Archaeologicai Resources. Given following mitigation measures would projecl applicants specific <br /> ihat the DPP area is located on alluvial reduce the potential impact of new environrnental <br /> soils, on the margin of San Francisco development facilitated by the DPP on review; condition <br /> Bay, near former wetlands, and along undiscovered archaeological of grading permit <br /> Redwood Creek and its tributaries, resources to a less-than-significant issuance; field <br /> ihere is a high potentiai for new level: verify <br /> development facilitated by ihe DPP to impiementation <br /> disturb unrecorded archaeological (a) In the event that any deposit of during grading and <br /> resources. This ossibilit re resents a prehistoric or historic archaeological <br /> P Y P construction. <br /> potenfially signiiicant impacf. materials is encountered during <br /> project construction activities, all work <br /> within an appropriate buffer area <br /> around the discovery shall be stopped <br /> and a qualified archaeologist meeting <br /> federal criteria under 36 CFR 61 shall <br /> be contacted to assess the deposit(s) <br /> and make recommendations. <br /> If deposils of prehistoric or historic <br /> archaeological materials cannoi be <br /> avoided by project activities, the City <br /> Pianning, Housing, and Economic <br /> Development Department shall <br /> confirm that the project applicant(s) <br /> have retained a qualified <br /> archaeologist to evaluate the potential <br /> historic siynificance of the <br /> resource(s). If the deposits are <br /> determined to be non-significant by a <br /> qualified archaeologist, avoidance is <br /> not necessary. If the deposits are <br /> deLermined to be potentially significant <br /> by ihe qualified archaeologist, the <br /> resources shall be avoided if feasible. <br /> If the City delermines that avoidance <br /> is not feasible, project impacts shall <br /> be miti ated in accordance with the <br /> .. <br /> Page 7 C:IDocuments and SettingsltpassanisALocal SettingslTemporary Inlemef FrleslOLK491mmcht (10671).doc <br />