Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Perfarmance Criteria Entit Verification Entit Re uirements <br /> DPP area that contain a historic properties which the DPP identifies as of grading permit <br /> resource may cause the demolition, historic properties which may be issuance; field <br /> destruction or alteration of, or an altered, relocated or removed, the City verify <br /> addition to, a historic resource such that shall require the applicant to implementation <br /> the significance of ihe resource is implement the following mitigation during grading and <br /> "rnaterially impaired." CEQA Guidelines measures. construction. <br /> section 15064.5, subd. (b)(3), provides <br /> that if a project follnws ihe Secretary of (a) If feasible, the applicant shall, to <br /> ihe interior's standards for the treaiment City satisFaction, ensure that the <br /> and rehabilitation of historic properties, project adheres to one or both of the <br /> then the impacks on the historical following standards: <br /> resource shall be considered less-than- <br /> significant. • Secretary of Interior's Standards <br /> for the Treatment of Historic <br /> The DPP includes an extensive set of Properties with Guidelines for <br /> Additions or Modifications to Hisforic Preserving, Rehabilitating, <br /> Resources (AMHR) Regulations that Resloring, and Reconstructing <br /> were written with the intent to comply Historic Buildings; or <br /> with the Secretary of the Interior's <br /> Standards for Rehabilitation as applied • Secretary of Interior's Standards <br /> to the particular significant for Rehabilitation and Guidelines <br /> characteristics of each identified for Rehabilitating Historic <br /> individual historic resource in the DPP Buildings (1995), Weeks and <br /> area. The DPP states that projects that Grimmer. <br /> are found by City staff to conform to <br /> these AMNR standards would require • 7he project shall be reviewed by <br /> no further evaluation for historic a qualified architect or <br /> resource impacts. However, unless architectural historian approved <br /> such a finding is made independently by by the City and meeting the <br /> a qualified professional meeting the Secretary of the Interior's <br /> Secretary of the Interior's Professional Professional Qualifications <br /> Qualifications Standards thai the project Standards published in ihe Code <br /> follows the Secretary of the Interior's of Federal Regulations (36 CFR <br /> siandards for the treatment and part 61), who shall make a <br /> rehabilitation of historic buildings, the recommendation to the City's <br /> potential for a significant historic Historic Resources Advisory <br /> resource impact may remain. In Committee as to whether the <br /> addition, the DPP identifies seven of the project follows the Secretary <br /> 47 historic resources within the DPP Standards for Rehabilitation, as <br /> area as historic properties which are well as to whether any specific <br /> allowed to be altered, relocated or modifications are necessary to do <br /> removed. The DPP notes that the City so. The final determination as to <br /> is developing a strategy to aid in the a projecYs adherence to the <br /> relocation of these resources by Secretary Standards for <br /> securin a new site for them, althou h Rehabilitation, as well as the <br /> .. <br /> Page 4 C:IDocuments and SettingsVtpassanis+lLoca! SeHingslTemporarylnlernei Files10LK491mmcht {10671).doc <br />