Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDEN7IFIED IMPACT RELA7ED MITIGATION MEASURE implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> PerFormance Criteria Entit Verification Entit Re uirements <br /> • Southbound US 101 (mixed flow) <br /> lanes between Hoily Street and <br /> Whipple Avenue (PM only); and <br /> • Southbound US 101 (mixed flow <br /> and HOV) lanes between <br /> Woodside Road and Marsh Road <br /> (AM and PM). <br /> These changes would represent a <br /> si nificant cumulative impaci. <br /> Impact 9-24: Cumulative Impacts on Mitigation 9-24: Mitigation of the Cily; fair-share City; Caltrans; If and when <br /> Freeway Ramp Operations. Under project contribution to this cumulative reimbursement C/CAG improvements <br /> Cumulative With Proje�t conditions, khe impact on this freeway ramp would from future adopted, City shail <br /> U5 101 to Woodside Road diagonal require extensive reconstruction of individual project conduct annual <br /> freeway ramp would operate at an this interchange. The SMCTA and the applicants. traffic monitoring <br /> unacceptable LOS F in both the AM City of Redwood City are investigating at this ramp and <br /> (V/C ratio 1.23) and PM (V/C ralio 1.18} possible interchange improvemenis, implement <br /> peak hour. This cha�ge would with ongoing studies to determine the improvements and <br /> represent a significant cumulative best design. However, the funding for fair-share <br /> impact. these improvements is not assured requirement when <br /> and, since the facilities are under level of service <br /> Caltrans jurisdiction, this mitigation reaches �OS E <br /> would require Caltrans approval. City (average delay of <br /> staff shall seek Caltrans' approval to greater than 55 <br /> implement these improvements. If seconds). <br /> Caltrans approves and permits the Individual projects <br /> City to implement these may require <br /> improvements, this impact could be Transportation <br /> mitigated to a less-than-significant Demand <br /> level. If Caltrans does not approve, Management <br /> and the City is unable to implement (TDM) plans per <br /> these improvements, then this impact City General Plan <br /> would be significant and unavoidable. policies and <br /> At this time, without assured approval CICAG adopted <br /> by Caltrans, this impact is deemed to guidelines. <br /> be si nificant and unavoidable. <br /> NOI SE <br /> Impact 11-1: Exposure ta Noise Mitigation 11-1. Noise studies Individual project City Condition of <br /> Levels Exceeding Sfandards. The consistent with the requirements of applicants building permil <br /> occupants of new multifamily residential the California Building Code shall be issuance; field <br /> development within the DPP area could conducted for proposed new verify <br /> be ex osed to noise levels in excess oF muliifamily residential projects wilhin implementation <br /> .. <br /> Page 31 C:IUocuments and SettingsltpassanisilLocalSedingslTemporarylntemetFiles10LK491mmcht (10671).doc <br />