Laserfiche WebLink
8.0 ', <br /> Exh�F3� 69 <br /> units and less non-residential development in the downtown area than was <br /> assumed for the evaluation in the UWMP. In addition, the potential water <br /> supply impacts of the DPP were evaluated for the EIR prepared for the City's � <br /> New General Plan, adopted October ll, 2010, which determined that total <br /> City-wide water demand, including the DPP area and all other areas of the <br /> City, could result in a significant and unavoidable impact. As explained in the <br /> UWMP and the Draft EIR for this Project, however, the demand generated by <br /> the proposed DPP, standing alone, would not exceed the City's anticipated <br /> supplies as determined in the UWMP. Therefore the impact of the DPP on <br /> water supply would be less than significant. <br /> Impact 10b. Water Distribution System Impacts. Development to the full <br /> extent permitted under the DPP could increase use of the City's water supply <br /> system, potentially reaching the limit of its capacity. However, the results of a <br /> water model analysis of the municipal water distribution system indicate that <br /> the existing water lines serving the DPP area have the capacity to handle <br /> development under the DPP for the average day and maximum day <br /> conditions. Therefore, the potential effect af the DPP on the municipal water <br /> distribution system would be less than significant. <br /> Innpact 10c. Fire Flow Impacts. Development to the full extent permitted <br /> under the DPP could increase fire flow demand and require water system <br /> improvements to accommodate the demand that would involve construction <br /> that could have environmental impacts. However the DPP is a planning <br /> document that does not propose, approve or permit any new, parcel-specific <br /> development projects or any new water system improvements. Until future <br /> development projects are proposed, identification and assessment of the <br /> environmental impacts caused by any necessary water system improvements <br /> would be speculative. This impact is therefore less than significant. <br /> Impact lOd. RWQCB Wastewater Treatment Requirements Impacts. <br /> The DPP could generate additional need for wastewater treatment. The 10- <br /> year capital improvement program initiated in 2008 for the South Bayside <br /> System Authority treatment plant would ensure that the facility is able to <br /> continue to meet or exceed the wastewater treatment requirements established <br /> for it by the RWQCB for discharge into San Francisco Bay, even with the <br /> additional wastewater generated by development allowed under the DPP. <br /> Therefore, the impacts of development under the DPP related to RWQCB <br /> wastewater treatment requirements would be less than significant. <br /> Impact 10e. Wastewater Treatment Capacity Impacts. The DPP could <br /> generate additional wastewater that must be processed under the set capacities <br /> allocated to Redwood City for treatment of Average Dry Weather Flow <br /> Wastewater and Peak Wet Weather Flow Wastewater at the South Bayside <br /> System Authority treatment plant. The City's current avaiiable treatment <br /> capacity is adequate to meet the estimated net increase under the DPP. In <br /> S:\RF.SOLUTIONS1Reso. 2092 CEQA Findings for DPP E�hibit B.doc 9 <br /> 01201] <br />