My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 12:57:48 PM
Creation date
1/20/2011 5:18:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.0 <br /> Exhi��� 8 <br /> Impact 9-4: Project Impact on Middlefield Road/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection. Under Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, this intersection <br /> would deteriorate to an unacceptable level of service (LOS E) from an acceptable <br /> LOS 0 under Background Conditions. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9-38 to 9-48 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact could be <br /> achieved by Mitigation Measure 9-4 (p. 9-50 of the DEIR) with the addition of a <br /> second eastbound left turn land on Woodside Road. <br /> However, these iinprovements would conflict with the newly adopted <br /> PED policies contained in the City's New General Plan. As noted above, these <br /> PED policies are intended to prornote alternative modes of transportation in the <br /> DPP area, emphasizing pedestrian and bicycle travel and a reduction in the <br /> number of vehicle miles traveled within and by residents of the City. The PED <br /> policies do so by, among other things, slowing traffic and enhancing pedestrian <br /> and bicycle infrastructure to ensure that the City's downtown street network <br /> facilitates safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle travel. This Mitigation <br /> Measure would conflict with these policies by impeding pedestrian mobility <br /> across Woodside Road. Therefore, Mitigation Measure 9-4 is deemed infeasible, <br /> and this impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to increased traffic described above, as set forth in the <br /> Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9-5: Project Impact on BroadwaylWoodside Road Intersection. <br /> Under both Background Conditions and Project Conditions during the PM peak <br /> hour, this intersection would operate at unacceptable LOS F. The additional project <br /> traffic would cause the critical delay to increase by more than five (5) seconds. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9-3$ to 9-4$ of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Cauncil finds that: <br /> (i} Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact cauld be <br /> S:�RF.SQLUTIONS1Reso. 2U92 CEQA Findings for DPP Ezhibit B.doc �� <br /> Q12011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.