My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 12:57:48 PM
Creation date
1/20/2011 5:18:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.0 <br /> ExhiQ�$ 97 <br /> City. Mitigation Measure 9-20 would conflict with these policies by impeding <br /> pedestrian mobility at the intersection. In addition, as explained above, this <br /> potentially significant cumulative impact could be considered less than significant <br /> under the City's new LOS policies. Assuming, however, that this identified <br /> traffic increase represents a potentially significant cumulative impact, because <br /> implementing Mitigation Measure 9-20 would conflict with the City's PED <br /> policies, this measure is deemed infeasible and this potentially significant <br /> cumulative impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9-21. Cumulative Impact on Veterans Boulevard/Whipple Avenue <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during both the AM and <br /> PM peak periods, this intersection would continue to operate at an unacceptable <br /> LOS (E or F). The additional project traffic would cause the critical delay to <br /> increase by more than five (5) seconds for the PM peak hour. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9-�8 to 9-64 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Mitigation Measures. FEIR Mitigation Measure 9-6 (p. 9-51 <br /> of the DEIR) is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided in the Mitigation <br /> Monitoring and Reporting Program. <br /> c) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, <br /> the City Council finds that Mitigation Measure 9-6, discussed and adopted in Impact 9-6 <br /> above, will reduce the project contribution to this cumulative impact to a less than <br /> significant level because even though LOS at the identified intersection will continue to <br /> aperate at an unacceptable level, the change in the critical delay from Cumulative <br /> Without Project Conditions would be reduced to less than five (5) seconds. <br /> Impact 9-22. Cumulative Impact on Veterans Boulevard/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during both the AM and <br /> PM peak periods, this intersection would continue to operate at an unacceptable <br /> LOS F. The additional project traffic wonld cause the critical delay to increase by <br /> rnore than five (5) seconds. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9-58 to 9-64 nf the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> S.\RESOLUTIONS1Rcso. 2092 CGQA t�indings for DPP Exhibit B.doc 37 <br /> 012011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.