My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-01-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 12:57:48 PM
Creation date
1/20/2011 5:18:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT � <br /> • COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT E.I.R. <br /> • Comments were made by: <br /> - HRAC Members <br /> - Pianning Commission Members <br /> - Responsible and Interested Agencies <br /> - Individuals and Organizations <br /> • DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN UPDATE <br /> • CHANGES TO THE PLAN <br /> SINCE THE AUGUST 31 DRAFT <br /> • Typo cleanup. <br /> • Clarification of unclear text. <br /> • Improvements to graphics. <br /> • CHANGES TO THE PLAN <br /> SINCE THE AUGUST 31 DRAFT <br /> • Applicability (Page 27) <br /> • Right to Downtown Operations (Pages 54-55) <br /> • EIR Mitigation Measures: <br /> - Historic (Pages 44-45) <br /> - Noise (Page 48) <br /> - Odor (Page 48) <br /> • Historic Projects Review Process (Pages 29-30) <br /> • ALTERNATIVES <br /> • ALTERNATIVE 1 <br /> • Alternative 1 is the "No ProjecY' alternative. I <br /> - If adopted, current zoning stays in place. <br /> • ALTERNATIVES 6 and 7 <br /> • Alternatives 6 and 7 cannot be adopted at this time because a full CEQA analysis <br /> was not conducted on them. <br /> - Alternative 6(Revised Boundary): EIR determined that this change would <br /> not substantially avoid or lessen impacts, and would not achieve historic <br /> resource preservation objectives. <br /> - Alternative 7(Alt. Location): No sites of adequate size (55 to 75 acres of <br /> developable land); Does not achieve the primary objective of improving <br /> the Downtown area; Does not substantially lessen impacts. <br /> � ALTERNATIVE 2 <br /> • Alternative 2: Reduced Development Capacity <br /> - Residential cap reduced 1,875 units <br /> - Office cap reduced to 206,250 square feet <br /> - Retail cap reduced to 165,750 square feet <br /> - Lodging cap remains at 200 rooms <br /> • ALTERNATIVE 4 <br /> Page 3 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.