My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res11 15086
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Res11 15086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2011 3:51:43 PM
Creation date
1/26/2011 3:51:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> increase represents a potentially significant cumulative impact, because <br /> implementing Mitigation Measure 9 -2 would conflict with the City's PED <br /> policies, and because the improvements required by this mitigation measure are <br /> not within the City's jurisdiction, this mitigation measure is deemed infeasible, <br /> and this impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9 -12: Cumulative Impact on Main Street/Woodside Road <br /> Westbound Ramps Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during <br /> both the AM and PM peak hour, this intersection would continue to operate at an <br /> unacceptable LOS F. The additional project traffic would cause the critical delay to <br /> increase by more than five (5) seconds, plus the peak hour signal warrant. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -58 to 9 -64 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact could be <br /> achieved by Mitigation Measure 9 -3 as discussed under Impact 9 -3, above. <br /> However, as noted above, the improvements proposed by Mitigation Measure 9 -3 <br /> are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of Caltrans, and can and should be <br /> adopted by Caltrans. Because implementation of this mitigation measure is <br /> outside of the City's jurisdiction, it is deemed infeasible and therefore this impact <br /> is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> U: \Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 31 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.