My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res11 15086
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Res11 15086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2011 3:51:43 PM
Creation date
1/26/2011 3:51:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> Impact 9 -13: Cumulative Impact on Middlefield Road/Jefferson Avenue <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, <br /> this intersection would degrade from LOS E to LOS F. The additional project <br /> traffic would cause the critical delay to increase by more than five (5) seconds. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -58 to 9 -64 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of the project contribution <br /> to this cumulative impact could be achieved through Mitigation Measure 9 -13 <br /> (pages 9 -67 to 9 -68 of the DEIR) which would require the restriping of the <br /> southbound approach of Middlefield Road to provide one through lane and one <br /> right turn lane, and prohibit southbound left turns (from Middlefield Road to <br /> Jefferson Avenue, towards Broadway). With this improvement, the intersection <br /> would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS, but the change in the critical <br /> delay from Cumulative Without Project Conditions would be reduced to less than <br /> five (5) seconds, a less than significant level. However, these improvements <br /> would conflict with newly adopted PED policies contained in the City's New <br /> General Plan. PED policies are intended to promote alternative modes of <br /> transportation in the DPP area, emphasizing pedestrian and bicycle travel and a <br /> reduction in the number of vehicle miles traveled within and by residents of the <br /> City. The PED policies do so by, among other things, slowing traffic and <br /> enhancing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to ensure that the City's DPP <br /> street network facilitates safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle travel. The <br /> improvements would conflict with these policies by impeding pedestrian mobility. <br /> In addition, as explained above, the New General Plan contains additional policies <br /> and programs pursuant to which the City will no longer rely on specific LOS <br /> measurements to determine the significance of a project's potential traffic impacts <br /> in the downtown area, and pursuant to these new LOS Policies and programs, this <br /> potential cumulative impact could be considered less than significant. Assuming, <br /> however, that this identified traffic increase represents a potentially significant <br /> cumulative impact, because implementing Mitigation Measure 9 -13 would <br /> conflict with the City's PED policies, this measure is deemed infeasible, and this <br /> impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> U:\Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 32 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.