Laserfiche WebLink
1. Overstatement of Return on Water Enterprise Rate Base. In FY 2007 -08, the <br /> retum on the Water Enterprise rate base included in the Suburban Revenue Requirement was <br /> overstated by $537,700, as a result of incorrectly treating certain capital additions funded <br /> through the 2006A Series Revenue Bonds as having been funded through the 2002 Revenue <br /> Bonds. The calculation of the correction is shown on Attachment B and the adjustment is <br /> shown in the Compliance Auditor's report on the Statement of Changes in the Balancing <br /> Account as of June 30, 2009 issued in August 2010. <br /> 2. Capital Grants. During FY 2007 -08, the SFPUC capitalized assets whose <br /> construction had been funded, in part, by federal grants in the amount of $3,659,109. Sections <br /> 4.06(b)(i), 4.07 and 4.08 of the 1984 Contract require the exclusion of grant funded assets <br /> from the wholesale rate base on which the Suburban Purchasers pay depreciation and return. <br /> The calculation of the amount by which the wholesale portion of the Water Enterprise rate <br /> base is to be reduced as of June 30, 2008 in order to reflect these capital grants is shown on <br /> Attachment C. <br /> 3. Impact of Correction to Rate Base Reflecting Grants on Suburban Revenue <br /> Requirement for FY 2007 -08. The Suburban Revenue Requirement includes depreciation and <br /> return on the wholesale rate base. The reduction of the wholesale rate base as of June 30, <br /> 2008 described in Section 2 results in a corresponding reduction in these components of the <br /> Suburban Revenue Requirement for FY 2007 -08 of $76,486, as shown on Attachment D. <br /> At the same time, the parties recognize that, when calculating the Suburban Revenue <br /> Requirement for FY 2007 -08, the SFPUC treated the amount of a grant for improvements to <br /> the Millbrae Administration Building (to be excluded from the rate base as provided in Section <br /> 2) as a direct credit against the ending Balancing Account for FY 2007 -08 and that this <br /> treatment was reflected in the Compliance Auditor's report for that fiscal year. <br /> In calculating the Suburban Revenue Requirement for FY 2008 -09, the SFPUC <br /> changed the accounting method by which the Suburban Purchasers receive the benefit of <br /> capital grants. Rather than treating the adjustment as a credit to the Balancing Account, the <br /> new approach reduced the net book value of assets by the amount of grants received. In <br /> order to apply this approach consistently, the Balancing Account credit previously given in FY <br /> 2007 -08 of $461,670 must be reversed. <br /> December 20, 2010 Final 2 2630358.1 <br />