Laserfiche WebLink
6. A Ao <br />PROJECT ANALYSIS: <br />PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS <br />Attached are five (5) draft ordinances addressing the following issues: <br />1. The construction of arbors and trellises in setback areas; <br />2. Definitions and standards for measurement of residential height; <br />3. Definitions, land use classifications, and parking standards for medical <br />offices, medical clinics, and research and development uses; <br />4. Definitions and allowance for "theaters" in the Central Business Retail <br />(CBR) district; and <br />5. Provisions to accommodate child day care facilities. <br />The discussion below is organized to review each proposed amendment in <br />order. Attachments 2 - 6 (under separate cover) are summary outlines of the <br />ordinance changes to provide further information on each amendment. Each <br />outline includes: identification of relevant Code sections; a statement of noted <br />problems and intended purposes for the amendment; a review of how zoning <br />regulations in other mid - Peninsula cities address similar code provisions; and <br />highlights of the key changes proposed. <br />In some instances, the ordinance amendments include graphics or tables to <br />better illustrate the provisions that are proposed. These graphics are intended, <br />for the most part, to be incorporated into the Zoning Ordinance, in close <br />proximity to the associated text. Language has been included to specify that <br />such graphics are for illustrative purposes only, and that if graphics and text are <br />not consistent, the text provisions shall control. <br />1. Arbors and Trellises <br />The intent of the first group of amendments is to provide standards for the <br />location of arbors and trellises, and similar open structures, in setback <br />areas in residential zones. Staff has identified that a number of these <br />structures exist throughout the city, though the Zoning Ordinance currently <br />does not allow them. Many residents have in the past requested approval <br />of these minor structures, but staff could not process these requests <br />without a variance, despite the negligible impact of the project. This <br />amendment would allow for minor open structures to be located in <br />setbacks with limitations to assure that visual impacts to neighbors and to <br />the public are minimized. Attached to the ordinance are diagrams and a <br />table that summarize the standards outlined in the text (the table will be <br />used only as a handout, not as a part of the Zoning Ordinance when the <br />amendment is codified). <br />3 <br />