Laserfiche WebLink
RA-1 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />improvement of any structure, building, road or <br />other imprc, mment is competitively bid and a <br />protest is made, the contract may be-entered into <br />pending final decision on the protest. If the con- <br />tract is later determined to be invalid due to a <br />defect or defects in the competitive bid process, <br />this bill entitles the contractor who entered into the <br />contract with the public entity to be paid the rea- <br />sonable cost, specifically excluding profit, of the <br />labor, equipment, materials and services furnished <br />by the contractor prior to the date of the determina- <br />tion, subject to conditions. <br />AB 453 overturns a longstanding principle of <br />contractor's bearing risk. City officials argue that <br />this bill would reduce the incentive for bidders to <br />comply with bidding regulations, knowing that they <br />would still receive some payment unless fraud <br />could be conclusively proven. This would invite a <br />new level of gamesmanship in the bidding process, <br />as well as increased litigation. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman; Status: SenJud;Hrg -7/1, Position: <br />Oppose. <br />SB 966 (Alarcon). Contractor's Costs. The <br />author has offered amendments to SB 966 that are <br />intended to address two concerns raised by public <br />agencies. First, the original section 1781 (a) (2) <br />was deleted from the bill. Second, the original <br />section 1781 (a) has been amended to narrow the <br />circumstances in which a contractor may recover <br />"increased costs." The amendments seek to <br />address concerns that a contractor that assumed in <br />its bid pricing that a project would be a prevailing <br />wage project might be able to claim entitlement to <br />reimbursement for "increased costs" when a deci- <br />sion issues that a project does indeed require the <br />payment of prevailing wages. Without these <br />amendments to require a positive representation by <br />a public entity that the project is in fact a prevailing <br />wage contract the bill should be opposed. Taxpay- <br />ers will end up losing large amounts of money <br />because a contractor claims to have not known the <br />law. Also this is unfair to public agencies that will <br />lose on local agencies additional burdens at the <br />time of fiscal crisis. SB 966 authorizes a contractor <br />to bring an action in a court of competent jurisdic- <br />tion to recover from a public agency any increased <br />costs incurred by the contractor as a result of (1) <br />any decision that classifies, after the time at which <br />the awarding body accepts the contractor's bid, a <br />project as a "public work," or (2) a change, after the <br />time at which the awarding body accepts the <br />contractor's bid, in the prevailing wage rate. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman; Status: AsLabBEmp;Hrg -7/9. <br />Position: Review and Comment. <br />AB 872 (Strickland). Speed Limits. AB 872 <br />passed out of the Assembly by a vote of 77 -0. The <br />bill does not implement a new prima facie speed <br />limit or change the use of the 85th percentile <br />methodology in setting speed limits; it does amend <br />Sec. 627 of the CVC by adding "persons at work" to <br />roadway users whose safety can be considered by <br />the local authority in setting speed limits, and also <br />clarifies that the local authority is the entity that can <br />consider the safety of roadway users in applying <br />the 85th percentile methodology. Support letters <br />have been received from public agencies and <br />private utilities whose employees are required to <br />work in and adjacent to roadways, and whose <br />safety is endangered by high speed drivers. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman; Status: SenTrans;Hrg -7/8, <br />Position: Support. <br />PUBLIC SAFETY <br />AB 150 (Reyes). Sex Offender Registration. <br />AB 150 clarifies that a person required to register <br />as a convicted sex offender who violates more than <br />one requirement of the sex offender registration <br />law, or who violates the same requirement more <br />than once, commits a separate continuing offense <br />each time. Current law states if an offender returns <br />to the original jurisdiction, then a new duty arises <br />because the local law enforcement agency has a <br />renewed interest in keeping him or her under <br />surveillance. However, this responsibility is not <br />expressly written in the statute. AB 150 makes it <br />clear and unambiguous that a sex offender must <br />register within a prescribed period of time each time <br />he or she enters a jurisdiction. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman, Status: SenApps, Position: Support. <br />AB 131 (Parra). Firearms. Prohibitions. <br />Juvenile Offenders. AB 1315 expands the scope <br />of the existing law prohibiting a juvenile adjudicated <br />of specified offenses from possessing any firearm <br />until the age of 30. Specifically, AB 1315 prohibits a <br />PAGE 10 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />