Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> i f <br /> • <br /> 10. Paragraph 8 of. Resolution No. 6882 is hereby amended to <br /> read as follows : <br /> "8 . Use of EIR. (a) Certification. Every officer or <br /> agency of the City having final responsibility for approval <br /> or disapproval of a proposed project or having the authority <br /> to undertake the project shall review and consider the <br /> environmental impact report for the project prior to approving, <br /> disapproving, or undertaking the project. Such officer or <br /> agency shall certify that the final EIR has been completed in <br /> compliance with CEQA, the guidelines, and this resolution, and <br /> that said officer or agency having final approval authority <br /> over the project has reviewed and considered the information <br /> contained in the EIR prior to the approval of the project. <br /> " (b) Findings . No officer or agency of the City having <br /> final responsibility for approval or disapproval of a proposed <br /> project or having the authority to undertake the project shall <br /> approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been <br /> completed which identifies one or more significant effects on <br /> the environment of the project unless such officer or agency <br /> makes one or more of the following written findings for each <br /> of said significant effects, accompanied by a statement of <br /> the facts supporting each finding: <br /> " (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or <br /> incorporated into, the project which mitigate or <br /> avoid the significant environmental effects thereof <br /> as identified in the final EIR; <br /> " (2) Such changes or alterations are within the res- <br /> ponsibility and jurisdiction of another public <br /> agency and not the officer or agency making the <br /> finding, and such changes have been adopted by <br /> such other agency, or can and should be adopted by <br /> such other agency; and/or <br /> " (3) Specific economic, social, or other considerations <br /> make infeasible the mitigation measures or project <br /> alternatives identified in the final EIR. <br /> "The findings required hereunder shall be supported by <br /> substantial evidence in the record. The finding in subparagraph <br /> (b) (2) shall not be made if the officer or agency of the City <br /> making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another <br /> agency to deal with the identified feasible mitigation measures <br /> or alternatives . " <br /> 11. Paragraph 10 of Resolution No. 6882 is hereby amended to <br /> read as follows: <br /> "10 . Notice of Determination. Upon approval of, or <br /> determination to carry out a project which is subject to the <br /> provisions of this resolution, the Planning Director shall <br /> file notice of such approval or such determination with the <br /> County Clerk, County of San Mateo, or County Clerk of the <br /> County in which the project will be located, if not the County <br /> of San Mateo, in accordance with the provisions of Section <br /> 21152 (a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15085 (h) of <br /> the California Administrative Code . " <br /> -18- <br />