Res65 4589 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Name and Address of Obiector 3. Claude Bergman Bergie Plumbing Co. 3570 Haven Ave. William P. Slade 3562 Haven Ave. Redwood City Written Nature of Objection or Oral Written Haven Avenue Improvement District presently in process; imcludes drainage facilities in Haven Avenue. No benefit will be received by properties within Haven Avenue Improvement District from proposed Redwood City GID 1 -65. 4. John W. Roland Oral 1004 -5th Ave. Redwood City 5. Phil Gallion, Oral Regal Sales 3586 Haven Ave. Redwood City 6. James R. MacDonald Oral 3031 Carson St. Redwood City 7. James R. MacDonald Written 3031 Carson St. Redwood City and 84 additional property owners on Carson St., Foothill St., Goodwin Ave., Alameda de las Pulgas and Ferntlde Street 8. Charles Baker 3536 Haven Ave. Oral Redwood City 9. Louis Galtz Oral - 3624 Haven Ave. Redwood City 10. Joseph J. Phelon Oral 330 King St. Redwood City 11. Ernest C. Jones Oral .1152 -17th Ave. Redwood City 12. Carol C. Rolafson Oral 112 Murray Court Redwood City 13. Joseph Bettar Oral 804 Canyon Rd. Redwood City 14.*Aldo P. Lera Oral 636 Canyon Road,Redwood 15. Peter L. Lombardo Oral 2623 Eaton Ave. Redwood City Protests inclusion of "Friendly Acres" area until "Fair Oaks" area has been properly drained. Same.as protest No. 3. Does not protest inclusion of 3031 Carson St. property in district, but protests inclusion of any storm drainage improvements as re- commended by Adamson report from Connecticut Ave..to entrance Of Stulsaft Park. No objection to inclusion of stated properties within proposed GID 1 -65, but protests proposed improvements to storm drainage of Redwood Creek up- stream from Connecticut Street for following reasons: (1) Existing channel capacity adequate; (2) No flooding has been experienced; (3) Pro- posed improvements would decrease property values; destroy natural beauty of creek; destroy natural beauty of creek; destroy irreplaceable trees; make natural creek channel into ditch; (4) This strip of channel does not contribute to silting problem down- stream; (5) Present creek provides recreation. Same as protest No. 3. Same as protest No. 3. Objects to inclusion within district of area within 1 /8th mile of 330 King Street because no benefit will be received and no drainage problem exists within that area. Requests removal of 1152 -17th Avenue from boundaries of district because no drainage problem exists at that location. Protests inclusion of 112 Murray Court until such time as additional information is available as to specific improvements to be constructed. Protests inclusion of 804 Canyon Road until project financing has been finally determined. Protests formation of- district because of lack Cty,of information. Protests inclusion of subject property. No specific reason given. Note: Reference is hereby made to the records on file in the office of the City Clerk in the case of all written protests or protest petitions referred to above. Said written protests and protest petitions are hereby referred to and incorporated herein as if fully set forth herein verbatim. 3.