My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:35:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2003 3:08:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Interview
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9 X -/3 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />which the awarding body accepts the contractor's <br />bid, in the prevail ng wage rate. <br />Two primary factors motivated the sponsors <br />to propose SB 966 <br />(a) Uncertainty (by awarding bodies and <br />contractors) regarding the interpretation of provi- <br />sions of SB 975, in determining which projects will <br />be defined as "public works" and subject to <br />prevailing wages; and <br />(b) Contractors' dissatisfaction with a recent <br />appellate court decision Landeros v. Department <br />of Corrections (2002) 99 Cal.AppAth 271. The <br />sponsors appear to believe that the Landeros <br />decision stands for the proposition that contrac- <br />tors are unable to seek reimbursement from <br />awarding bodies even if the awarding bodies <br />affirmatively misrepresent prevailing wage re- <br />quirements. <br />Instead of proposing reasonable measures to <br />clarify these issues, SB 966 completely and <br />dramatically shifts responsibility for compliance <br />with prevailing wage requirements away from <br />contractors (where it currently resides) to local <br />agencies. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: <br />AsLab &Emp, Hrg; 7/9, Position: Oppose. <br />AB 872 (Strickland). Speed Limits. AB 872 <br />amends Sec. 627 of the California Vehicle Code <br />by adding "persons at work" to those roadway <br />users whose safety can be considered by the <br />local authority in setting speed limits. It also <br />clarifies that the local authority is the entity that <br />can consider the safety of roadway users in <br />applying the 85th percentile methodology. The bill <br />does not implement a new prima facie speed limit <br />or change the use of the 85th percentile method- <br />ology in setting speed limits. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman, Status: SenTrans, Position: Support. <br />SJR 7 (Kamette). Highways: Trucking <br />Size. SJR 7 memorializes Congress to protect <br />the safety of motorists on California highways and <br />prevent further degradation of the nation's tax- <br />payer supported infrastructure network. Heavier <br />single trailer trucks and longer combination ve- <br />hicles would overstress bridges, increase pave- <br />ment damage and other damage to associated <br />infrastructure and increase danger to our citizens. <br />Additionally it asks the federal government to <br />maintain the current federal truck size and weight <br />limitations and to oppose proposals to experiment <br />with longer and heavier trucks on public highways <br />in the reauthorization of the federal Transportation <br />Equity Act for the 21st Century (Public Law 105- <br />178). SJR 7 passed out of Senate Transportation <br />by a vote of 16-2 on 718. Staff: Natasha Fooman, <br />Status: AsmFlr, Position: Support. <br />HOUSING AND LAND USE <br />SB 18 (Burton) Sacred Sites. SB 18 is <br />scheduled to be amended soon to incorporate <br />language reminiscent of last year's SB 1828 <br />(Burton), which sought to modify the way planning <br />occurs statewide because of the high prevalence <br />of Native American Sacred Sites. <br />The 24 pages of amendments that the author <br />is likely to accept expand membership on the <br />Native American Heritage Commission and require <br />the Commission to establish a Traditional Tribal <br />Cultural Site (TICS) Register, which defines a <br />"site" as one that "is associated with the traditional <br />beliefs, practices, lifeways, and ceremonial activi- <br />ties of a Native American tribe." The Commission <br />would be charged with adopting criteria and <br />procedures for establishing the TTCS registry and <br />promulgating the necessary regulations for the <br />registry's administration. The amendments also <br />make a number of changes to the way local <br />governments prepare and update their general <br />plans. For example, the amendments require <br />state general plan guidelines to include a section <br />that provides advice for consulting with Native <br />American tribes and the Native American Heritage <br />Commission about preservation of sites listed in <br />the Traditional Tribal Cultural Site (TICS) Register. <br />In addition, the amendments make sites listed in <br />the TTCS Register natural resources for the <br />purposes of preparing the open space element of <br />a general plan. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.