My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:35:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2003 3:08:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Interview
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9A /y <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />The amendments also establish a new pro- <br />cess for evaluating projects that occur within five <br />miles of a site listed in the TICS. <br />Finally, the bill modifies CEQA by characteriz- <br />ing a project as having a significant effect on the <br />environment if it would cause a substantial ad- <br />verse change in a TICS. The League's Housing <br />and Community and Economic Development <br />Policy Committee voted unanimously to oppose <br />SB 18 if it incorporated language that makes <br />changes of this nature. The League Board will <br />take a position on this measure on July 18th. <br />Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: AsNatRes, Hrg. 7/ <br />14, Position: Oppose. <br />SB 619 (Duchen , <) Local Land Use Author - <br />ity SB 619 (Ducheny) passed the Assembly <br />Housing Committee with amendments which <br />removed some, but not all of the League's con- <br />cerns. This legislation, sponsored by low- income <br />housing advocates and other groups, contains <br />numerous changes to various laws affecting local <br />land use authority and housing programs. The <br />amendment taken in committee removed the <br />worst aspect of the bill that exposed local govem- <br />ments to annual lawsuits on housing element <br />issues. The League, however, continues to <br />oppose language recently added to the bill which <br />would eliminate conditional use permits for hous- <br />ing projects up to 100 units, and specified "mixed <br />use" projects that meet a number of prescriptive <br />requirements. Although this language is some- <br />what narrow, its practical effect is to reduce <br />opportunities for public participation in the local <br />land use decision - making process. It also <br />affects all communities equally across the state, <br />even those that are building affordable housing. <br />The League is also concerned that approving <br />SB 619 at this time could undermine ongoing <br />negotiations on housing issues at HCD. After <br />several years of battles between local govem- <br />ments and housing advocacy groups, local <br />governments have entered into good faith HCD- <br />convened negotiations. Two League- sponsored <br />measures, AB 980 (Salinas) and AB 1158 <br />(Lowenthal), a: a parked as two-year bills in the <br />Assembly Hous;ng Committee. SB 744 (Dunn) is <br />a two-year bill on the Senate Floor (Ail three of <br />these bills have been described in more detail in <br />previous editions of Priority Focus). In our view, <br />moving SB 619, when it includes provisions such <br />as those limiting local land use authority, clearly <br />violates the spirit of these good faith negotiations, <br />particularly since the League was excluded from <br />discussions where some of the most problematic <br />language was developed. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br />Status: AsHou &ComDev, Position: Oppose. <br />AB 1633 (Levine) Building Standards, Now <br />Two-Year Bill. AB 1633 was gutted and amended <br />last week to authorize the California Building <br />Standards Commission to adopt, approve, codify <br />and publish building standards for any building <br />where no state agency has the authority to adopt <br />building standards for buildings, should the Com- <br />mission determine that uniform, statewide stan- <br />dards are necessary to protect the public health <br />and safety. This is a significant expansion of state <br />authority and affects many buildings throughout the <br />state. The League, building officials, fire chiefs and <br />other organizations responded quickly with opposi- <br />tion. AB 1633 has become a two-year bill, in the <br />Senate Housing Committee due to that opposition, <br />as well as several critical newspaper editorials <br />raising the potential effects of this bill on plastic <br />pipe, and other building code disputes. Staff: Dan <br />Carrigg, Status: Two-year bill, Position: Oppose. <br />SB 567 (Torlakson) Local Ordinances. <br />Penalties for Violation. This bill increases the <br />existing statutory caps on the maximum penalties <br />that can be imposed on violators of local building <br />and safety codes and ordinances. The penalties <br />outlined in current law have not been modified for <br />approximately twenty years. The bill increases the <br />maximum penalty for a second violation from $200 <br />to $500, and from $500 to $1,000 for a third viola- <br />tion. SB 567 takes a positive step towards provid- <br />ing local governments, particularly those in rapidly <br />growing communities, with the resources they <br />need to ensure that buildings in their jurisdiction are <br />PAGE 14 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.