My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-07-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:35:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2003 3:08:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Interview
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/21/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f. .4 -/S <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />safe. Subjecting code violators to more severe <br />penalties can serve at a more effective deterrent <br />and encourage them to bring their buildings into <br />compliance in a more timely manner. SB 567 has <br />passed both the Assembly and the Senate, and <br />now awaits further action on the Govemor's desk. <br />Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: Pending on <br />Govemor's Desk, Position: Sign. <br />AB 170 (Reyes) General Plans. San <br />Joaquin Air Quality DisWcL AB 170 imposes <br />significant mandates upon the local governments <br />within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Air <br />Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) by requiring <br />all local governments within the SJVAPCD to <br />adopt a detailed, separate "air quality" element in <br />their general plans, or amend other appropriate <br />elements of their general plan. Although the <br />legislation only applies to the San Joaquin Valley <br />region, the League remains concerned that AB <br />170 establishes statewide precedents for other <br />jurisdictions in the state. Issues are also raised <br />about how financially strapped local governments <br />will pay for this additional mandate, and how the <br />focus on air quality blends with the state policies <br />to force additional lands to be zoned for housing. <br />The bill passed the Senate Local Government <br />Committee by a narrow 43 margin. Cities within <br />the jurisdiction of this bill should review this bill <br />and to register their opposition in a timely manner <br />with the author. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: <br />SenApps, Position: Oppose. <br />AB 332 (Mullin) Airport Land Use Commis- <br />sions. Cities neighboring airports should carefully <br />examine AB 332. The bill allows the Division of <br />Aeronautics at the California Department of <br />Transportation to become more involved in local <br />land use decisions affected by airport land use <br />plans. <br />AS 332 imposes new notification requirements <br />on local agencies. Under existing law, airport land <br />use plans are prepared by Airport Land Use <br />Commissions with technical assistance from the <br />Division of Aeronautics. The state, however, does <br />not approve the plans. Local governments can <br />overrule an airport land use plan with a two-thirds <br />vote. Local agencies are not currently required to <br />notify the Airport Land Use Commission or solicit <br />commission comments when they intend to <br />overrule a commission decision. By contrast, AB <br />332 requires local agencies to notify the ALUC <br />when they propose to overrule a commission <br />decision, and to provide the Commission with the <br />opportunity to comment. <br />Perhaps more troubling, however, are the <br />provisions of AB 332 that require local agencies to <br />also notify the Division of Aeronautics and solicit <br />Division comments each time they propose to <br />overrule a Commission decision. This is a new <br />role for the state, particularly since, under existing <br />law, neither Airport Land Use Commissions, nor <br />local governments are require to seek state <br />approval or comments when adopting, amending <br />or overruling portions of their plans. The Senate <br />Local Government Committee recently approved <br />the bill. The cities of Concord and Burbank <br />testified in opposition. Other cities with adjacent <br />airports are strongly encouraged to review this <br />legislation. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: SenApps, <br />Position Review and Comment. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />SB 20 (Sher). Electronic Waste. SB 20 <br />establishes a manufacturer and shared responsi- <br />bility program for the collection and recycling of <br />electronic waste. It prohibits any person from <br />selling certain electronic devices, designated as <br />hazardous, in California unless they either develop <br />and implement a program to provide convenient <br />recycling opportunities for their products, or they <br />pay a fee in lieu of such a program to be used to <br />support block payments to local governments and <br />others. The bill also includes provisions that <br />protect California manufacturers from out of state <br />computer manufacturers who avoid complying <br />with the provisions of SB 20 . SB 20 continues to <br />evolve as the author accepts amendments as a <br />result of negotiations with stakeholders and <br />legislative committee recommendations. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.