My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res89 RD-89-19
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Redevelopment
>
1980-1989 partial
>
1989
>
Res89 RD-89-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:59:03 PM
Creation date
7/18/2003 11:10:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
Redevelopment
Date
12/4/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CWM:djm 11/06/89 (098/#25) <br /> CWM:djm 1] '9/89R <br /> <br /> If remains are Native American the Coroner <br /> has 24 hours to notify the Native American <br /> Heritage Commission. <br /> b. Any artifacts discovered during excavation <br /> <br /> shall be handled by a qualified archaeologist <br /> and turned over immediately to a government <br /> agency, to insure that they will be made <br /> available for public display. <br /> <br /> 3. Rationale and Facts Supportin~ Findings. There <br /> is little likelihood that cultural resources will be <br /> found in the Amendment Area but it is appropriate to <br /> provide a mechanism for their proper disposition in <br /> the event that a discovery should occur. The <br /> mitigations outlined in the findings are appropriate <br /> and acceptable to the Native American Heritage <br /> Commission. <br /> <br /> 4. Mitigation Monitoring Responsibility. <br /> <br /> Responsibility for mitigation monitoring shall be <br /> with the Planning Commission, and the Redevelopment <br /> Director, and handled on a project by project basis. <br />B. INFEASIBILITY OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br /> The following Alternatives to the project described in the <br /> <br />Final EIR, which would reduce or avoid significant environmental <br />impacts and which are not included as part of the project, are <br />infeasible for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> 1. The No Project Alternative. This Alternative <br /> <br /> 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.