Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 11/06/89 (098/#25) <br /> CWM:djm 1~/29/89R <br /> <br />consists of leaving the Redevelopment Plan as <br />currently adopted and leaving the Amendment Area in <br />its blighted condition. While any significant <br />adverse effect identified in the Final EIR would be <br />eliminated by this Alternative, the overriding <br />considerations of achievement of the goals of the <br />General Plan, the rehabilitation and replacement of <br />housing for low-and moderate-income families, job <br />creation and community beautification outweigh the <br />adverse effects set forth in the Final EIR. This <br />alternative is, therefore, infeasible and undesirable <br />because it would also preclude attainment of the <br />express objectives of the Community Redevelopment <br />Law. The avoidance of limited negative effects is <br />not justified by the loss of the specifically <br />identified beneficial impacts on the environment to <br />be realized as a result of the Project, as the Final <br />EIR recognizes in Chapter Six. <br /> <br /> 2. The Limited Power Of ~Eminent Domain Alternative. <br /> Under this alternative, the power of eminent domain <br /> would be limited to 36 of the estimated 400 dwelling <br /> units located in non-residentially zoned portions of <br /> the Amendment Area. This alternative is infeasible <br /> and should not be adopted for two reasons: <br /> <br /> a. The power of eminent domain is critical to <br /> <br /> the accomplishment of almost all of the <br /> objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law <br /> <br /> 20 <br /> <br /> <br />