Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 11/06/89 (098/#25) <br /> CWM:djm ~l/29/89R <br /> <br /> b. Findings. Adverse impacts on the visual quality of <br /> the Amendment Area could be mitigated to a less than <br /> significant level. <br /> <br /> c. Rationale and Facts Supporting Findings. The visual <br /> compatibility of specific projects proposed in the <br /> Amendment Area should be assessed and mitigations <br /> recommended during site specific planning as a part <br /> of the environmental review process. Critical <br /> analysis of Proposed Projects will continue to be <br /> undertaken, as it is now, to ensure visual quality <br /> and compatibility. <br /> <br /> d. Monitoring Responsibility. Responsibility for <br /> <br /> monitoring these mitigation measures shall be with <br /> <br /> the Redevelopment Agency and the Redwood City <br /> Planning Director. <br /> <br />3. POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT. <br /> <br /> a. Significant Effects. Based on projected employment <br /> generated by General Plan buildout of the Amendment <br /> Area, there could be a p~tential demand for 706 new <br /> dwelling units. Figures used in the Amendment and <br /> EIR suggest that up to 935 units could be built in <br /> the Amendment Area, resulting in an increase of up to <br /> 229 units. <br /> <br /> b. Findings. <br /> <br /> 1. Demand for Dwelling Units. Demand for dwelling <br /> units should not be as high as the EIR indicated <br /> since some employees may already reside elsewhere in <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> <br />