Laserfiche WebLink
CWM:djm 11/06/89 (098/#25) <br /> CWM:djm 1/29/89R <br /> <br /> adequately addressed on a project area basis. <br />- Therefore, no mitigation efforts can be put forth to <br /> specifically address the "jobs/housing balance" <br /> issue. <br /> d. Mitigation Responsibility. Responsibility for <br /> <br /> monitoring these mitigation measures shall be <br /> <br /> assigned at the site specific project level. <br /> 4. TRAFFIC. <br /> a. Significant Effects. General Plan buildout of the <br /> <br /> Amendment Area could result in a net increase of 1745 <br /> per peak hour vehicle trips. The level of service <br /> would change at 5 of the 11 study area intersections. <br /> Two of the studied intersections would operate at an <br /> unacceptable Level of Service ("E") or worse. <br /> <br /> b. Findings. Traffic problems can be expected to <br /> <br /> increase; however, with adequate mitigation, as <br /> outlined below, these problems can be brought to <br /> within an acceptable level. The suggestion that <br /> development should be prohibited or delayed until the <br /> proposed Woodside Viaduct is constructed is rejected. <br /> Were this condition to be imposed upon the Amendment <br /> Area it would operate to achieve the opposite of the <br /> goals set forth by the Second Amendment and the <br /> General Plan, and serve as a "no growth" device. The <br /> construction of the Viaduct is not within the purvue <br /> of the Redevelopment Agency or the City of Redwood <br /> city. Since the responsibility for construction is <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br /> <br />