My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 L^ <br /> 5. "If such a person could be employed by the school district, could <br /> such a person arrect a person for violation of the signals of the <br /> school safety patrol when such violation was committed in his <br /> presence ?" <br /> Answer: Yes, but his authority to make such an arrect would be limited <br /> to the authority of any other private person and would not be derived <br /> from his employment as employee of the school district. Section 837 (1) <br /> of the Penal Code provides that a private person may arrest another <br /> "For a public offense comrrited or attempted in his presence." Section <br /> 164.38 of the Education Code provides that any person who disregards any <br /> traffic signal or direction given by a member of a school safety patrol <br /> shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and is subject tothe penalties pro- <br /> vided by Section 762 of the Vehicle Code. "Public offense ", which is <br /> defined by Section 15 of the Penal Code, includes a misdemeanor committed <br /> in his presence, under Section 837 (1) of the Penal Code, the affirmative <br /> answer to question number 5 would apply to any private person, and the fact <br /> that the person under discussion w as an employee of the school district <br /> would in no way increase his authority to make such arrest, nor would he <br /> be clothed with any additional immunities or charged with any additional <br /> liabilities or duties by reason of his employment in making such an arrest. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> LOUIS B. DENATTEIS, District Attorney <br /> By: Lyle R. Edson, Deputy <br /> This was followed by general discussion after which the motion carried. <br /> FURTHER REGARDING GILBERT UPHOLSTERY SHOP, 130 CERRITO AVENUE. DISTRICT <br /> ATTORNEY REPORT. The report stated that a review of their file showed that the <br /> question of the Gilbert's Upholstery Shop being a possible violation of the County <br /> Zoning Ordinance arose in early 1951 and inspections, investigations and discussions <br /> between this office, the Planning Commission Staff and the Attorneys for the Gilberts <br /> were carried on for many months upon promises that the Giblberts would accomplish <br /> certain modifications to their physical facilities and their method of doing <br /> business which would sett-Cy the home occupation provision in the County Zoning <br /> Ordinance. Photgraphs, inspection reports and office notes and summaries are <br /> included in our file in this matter. Inasmuch as the matter is closed as far as <br /> the County is concerned, because of the annexation to Redwood City having been <br /> effected, he had no objection to making the entire file in this office available <br /> to your City for its perusual and said file is enclosed herewith. <br /> Councilman Britschgi moved that the file be made a part of the record and filed, <br /> seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. This•was followed by general discussion <br /> and it was decided that the matter would be placed on the agenda for two weeks and <br /> would be settled at a study meeting prior to the Council meeting. <br /> CITY ENGINEER REGARDING PETITION FOH SANITARY SEWERS UPLAND ROAD, HIGHLANDS TERRITORY <br /> NO. 4. It is the understanding of the Engineering Department, b ased upon conditions <br /> required for improvements in Highlands Territory No. 1 and 2, that water mains must <br /> be constructed at the sane time as a part of the assessment district. The property <br /> 1 <br /> owners in the undedicated portion of Upland Road, now petitioning for sewers, are <br /> served by a very old 2 -inch wrought iron water line installed by the original <br /> developer of the Johnson Tract, which extends along Upland Road and connects with <br /> another very old 4- inch wrought iron water main near the Latter Day Saints Church <br /> on Cordilleras Road. Due to the fact that this is a very old, deteriorated, and <br /> inadequate main, he feels that the entire main to Cordilleras Road should be <br /> reconstructed at such time as the remainder of Upland Road becomes annexed to the <br /> City. For the present, the portion of this main, fronting on the property now <br /> being annexed, should be constructed at the same time as the sewer, which will <br /> result in almost double the assessment for sewers only. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.