My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Before authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for this job, this matter <br /> should be discussed by the City Council as to the amount of work to be included and <br /> whether the petitions should be returned for signatures to cover the additional work. <br /> City Engineer Jain explained that when the original petition for sewers was made up, <br /> someone in his department worded the petition for sewers and forgot about the water main, <br /> which should have been included along with the sewer line. After discussion, it was <br /> decided that the City Attorney should draw up an ordinance or find some method whereby <br /> the City could put in the water line from Cordilleras Road to the proposed assessment <br /> disctrict and then charge any and all new owners their share of the water assessment as <br /> they hook into our water system. City Engineer asked that the sewer petition be held up <br /> until such time as the City Attorney can report on his findings. He stated thattwo weeks <br /> delay would not hold up this assessment district too much, and that -the longer water <br /> line would benefit this area and give them better water service. <br /> CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION PREPARE PLANS FOR PARKING LOTS L. AND 6. The City Manager recommen- <br /> ded that the City Engineer be authorized to employ an engineer to prepare plans and <br /> specifications for parking lots 4 and 6, payment to be made from Parking District Bond <br /> Funds. It is understood that in the event any protion of creek covering is extended <br /> beyond the parking lot area, the cost of engineering services will be paid from City <br /> funds. <br /> Councilman Jones moved approval of recommendation, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. <br /> Mayor herkner stated that the City would pay their share of the parking lot only and the <br /> other property owners would pay their part. He also wanted to recommend to the Council <br /> that consideration be given to covering the creek from the eastern limits of the parking <br /> lot to Main Street if it can be financed. Councilman Jones asked how they would get <br /> the money from outside the parking district. City Attorney replied that it would be <br /> necessary to form a separate district and separate set of plans would have to be drawn up <br /> for each district. <br /> Councilman Britschgi stated that the motion should be changed to cover Lots 4 and 6, <br /> the other matter to be turned over for a study meeting with the Committee. This was <br /> followed by discussion in regard to hiring outside engineering firms to do the work. <br /> Councilman Jones then amended his motion and authorized the City Manager to employ out- <br /> side help for the plans of the two parking lots, with preference going to local engin- <br /> eers, if possible, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. This was again followed by a dis- <br /> cussion and City Engineer Jain asked if he might bring the problems that were involved <br /> before the Council at a study meeting. Councilman Jones then withdrew his motion, and <br /> the matter was placed on the agenda for the October 3rd Council Meeting. <br /> PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 3, JOHN THROCKMORTON, WEED SPRAYING, 41,640.67. This is the final <br /> payment except for the 10% retention. Councilman Britschgi moved that this be paid, <br /> seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. <br /> I/ RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS, COUNCIL AND DEPARTMENT HEADS: <br /> Councilman Britschgi reported on the Yacht Harbor situation and stated that the Engineering <br /> Department promised that their part of the report would be completed this week and would <br /> be referred to the Port Manager and the Port Commission for their next report. He <br /> stated that there was still a lot of work to be done before the report would be completed. <br /> Councilman Britschgi asked the City Engineer if there was any further information <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.