Laserfiche WebLink
' WE <br />• Water all active construction areas at least twice daily; <br />• Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand, or other materials that can be <br />blown away by the wind; <br />• Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials, or require all <br />trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard; <br />• Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all <br />unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction <br />sites; <br />• Sweep daily (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil materials carried <br />onto adjacent public streets; <br />• Hydroseed or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas; <br />• Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or wash off the tires or tracks of trucks and <br />equipment leaving the site; <br />• Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hours; <br />• Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to <br />public roadways; and <br />• Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. <br />Finding: The mitigation measures are feasible and would reduce the <br />potentially significant environmental impact described above to a less- than - significant <br />level. <br />The mitigation measures identified would reduce the potentially significant <br />environmental impact described above to a less- than - significant level, because they <br />would substantially reduce the amount of airborne dust generated at the Project site. <br />Watering the site, covering trucks and stockpiles, hydroseeding or soil stablizing, and <br />planting vegetation would contain dust on the ground at the site. Limiting traffic speeds <br />on unpaved roads would reduce the amount of dust lifted into the air by vehicles. <br />Installing sandbags and sweeping would remove exposed dust and silt from streets <br />adjacent to the site. <br />The potential impact of the Project as contemplated in the Higher <br />Occupancy Scenario would be similar to the potential impact of the Project as proposed, <br />because the construction activities of the Project as contemplated in the Higher <br />Occupancy Scenario would be similar to the construction activities of the Project as <br />proposed. Likewise, the mitigation measures would be similarly effective with respect to <br />the Project as proposed and the Project as contemplated in the Higher Occupancy <br />Scenario. <br />