AgdaPkt 2003-08-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�,, ,. The Redwood City Preferred Alternative would have the same impacts on air quality, noise, hazardous materials, population and housing, public services, and utilities and service systems as the Project. In addition, the Redwood City Preferred Alternative would have the same less- than - significant impacts on land uses as the Protect. The Redwood City Preferred Alternative would have the same trip generation characteristics as the Project, but the location and accessibility of site driveways would be different, which could change vehicle circulation in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. IV. MARSHALL STREET HOSPITAL ALTERNATIVE Description of Alternative: The Marshall Street Hospital Alternative represents a site plan developed jointly by Kaiser and the City of Redwood City early in the planning phase for the proposed Medical Center. The major difference between Marshall Street Hospital Alternative and the Project is the location of the replacement hospital. Rather than constructing the replacement Hospital on Veterans Boulevard as under the proposed project, the hospital would be constructed on the northwest corner of Marshall Street and Maple Street. The replacement hospital would be seven stories, rather than ten under the proposed project. The Marshall Street Hospital Alternative also includes a medical office building at the southeast corner of Veterans Boulevard and Walnut Street. The medical office buildings to be located along Veterans Boulevard would be five stories tall, similar to those in the Project. However, the medical office building to be located at the northeast corner of Marshall Street and Maple Street would be five stories tall, rather than the four -story medical office building included in the Project. The Marshall Street Hospital Alternative also places the plaza area within the center of the campus. Under this alternative, a portion of the existing surface parking lot located at the northwest corner of Main Street and Bradford Street would remain. Parking structure C would contain nine parking levels as opposed to six levels for Parking Structure D under the proposed project. Parking Structure B would contain six levels as opposed to five under the proposed project. However, this option would contain only three parking structures rather than the five parking structures under the proposed project. Phasing for the Marshall Street Hospital Alternative differs slightly from the proposed project. Rather than construct the replacement Hospital in Phase 2, MOB 2 and Parking Structure B would be constructed in Phase 2. The replacement Hospital would be constructed during Phase 3. Finding: The Marshall Street Hospital Alternative would have the same impacts on air quality, noise, hazardous materials, population and housing, public services, and utilities and service systems as the Project. In addition, the Marshall Street Hospital Alternative would have the same less- than - significant impacts on land uses as the Project. The Marshall Street Hospital Alternative would have the same trip 33