My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt97 Police Officers
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agmt97 Police Officers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:56:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 10:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Police Officers Association
PROJECT NAME
MOU - memorandum of understanding
RMP File Number
905
Date
3/4/1997
Reso Ref
13019
MO Ref
97-039
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Level II appeal the decision on the appropriate form to the <br />Personnel Officer. This statement shall include a copy of the <br />original grievance and appeal, and a clear, concise statement of <br />the reasons for the appeal. Evidence offered in support of a <br />disciplinal5, grievance filed pursuant to Section 17.2.3 of this <br />MOU shall be submitted in the form of written declarations <br />executed under penalty of perjury. <br /> <br />17.3.3.2 <br /> <br />The Personnel Officer shall communicate the decision to the <br />grievant within ten (10) days. If the Personnel Officer does not <br />respond within the time limits provided, the grievant may appeal <br />to the next level. <br /> <br />17.3.4 Level IV - Bindin~ Arbitration <br /> <br />17.3.4.1 <br /> <br />If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level 1II, the <br />grievant may within ten (10) days of the receipt of the decision <br />submit a request in writing to the Association for arbitration of <br />the dispute. Within twenty (20) days of the grievant's receipt of <br />the decision at Level III, the Association shall inform the City of <br />its intent as to whether or not the grievance will be arbitrated. <br />The Association and the City shall attempt to agree upon an <br />arbitrator. If no agreement can be reached, they shall request that <br />the State Conciliation Service supply a panel of five names of <br />persons experienced in hearing grievances in cities. Each party <br />shall alternately strike a name until only one remains. The <br />remaining panel member shall be the arbitrator. The order of the <br />striking shall be determined by lot. <br /> <br />17.3.4.2 <br /> <br />If either the City or the Association so requests, a separate <br />arbitrator shall be selected to hear the merits of any issues raised <br />regarding the arbitrability of a grievance. No hearing on the <br />merits of the grievance will be conducted until the issue of <br />arbitrability has been decided. The process to be used in <br />selecting an arbitrator shall be as set forth in 17.3.4.1. <br /> <br />17.3.4.3 <br /> <br />The arbitrator shall, as soon as possible, hear evidence and render <br />a decision on the issue or issues submitted to him. If the parties <br />cannot agree upon a submission agreement, the arbitrator shall <br />determine the issues by referring to the written grievance and the <br />answers thereto at each step. <br /> <br />17.3.4.4 <br /> <br />The City and the Association agree that the jurisdiction and <br />authority of the arbilrator so selected and the opinions the <br />arbitrator expresses will be confined exclusively to the <br />interpretation of the express provision or provisions of this MOU <br />at issue between the parties. The arbitrator shall have no <br />authority to add to, subtract fxom, alter, amend, or modify any <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.