My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 10:02:58 AM
Creation date
2/24/2005 3:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" . <br /> <br />8.B- g <br /> <br />Essentially, you have two options. They are: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Continue to pursue a private reimbursement agreement from as many property <br />owners as possible to help pay for most of the EIR, technical reports, and street <br />improvements. Clearly, the City Council believed that the developer should pay for <br />most of the work, with a small contribution by the City. Understandably, it may be <br />difficult to convince all the property owners to contribute given the varied interests <br />and the amount of money needed. Yet, it would be to your benefit to show as much <br />effort as possible. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Another option would be to prepare and submit to Community Development Services <br />a detailed analysis of your proposal, including site plan, property locations, <br />description proposal, and the written endorsement of interested property owners. <br />(You also might want to consider a larger contribution since your amount plus the <br />City's 18% contribution will certainly not be enough to cover the costs of the EIR and <br />technical reports). Staff will then review your proposal, prepare a cover <br />memorandum, and send it to the City Council. Ifthe City Council after reviewing <br />your proposal wants to re-examine the policy, then staffwill schedule the item for a <br />public hearing. If the policy does change, then the EIR and project would still have to <br />go through the normal planning process and numerous public hearings by the <br />Planning Commission and Planning staff. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />/.5/ <br /> <br />Tom Passanisi <br />Principal Planner <br /> <br />C: Deborah Nelson <br />Michael Church <br />Charles Csicsman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.