My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 10:02:58 AM
Creation date
2/24/2005 3:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. >,.-' <br /> <br />--, <br /> <br />8.B-IS- <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />October 12, 2004 <br /> <br />because such development and improvement of Laurel Way would require extensive <br />grading and the construction of retaining walls pursuant to the Improvement <br />Plans; further, water and sewer utilities are not currently available to said <br />properties. " <br /> <br />My lot at 3730 ftonts on the said paved portion of Laurel Way, and does not require for <br />development the construction of water and sewer lines, nor does it require extensive <br />grading and the construction of retaining walls pursuant to the Improvement Plans. In <br />addition, I have a properly designed, constructed and approved storm water drainage <br />system on my property (see pictures) that was signed offby John Lynch in engineering, <br />that further distinguishes my property ftom (the "Affected Area"). I've enclosed pictures, <br />drainage agreement, and as-built drawings for your review. <br /> <br />I've met with staff members Tom Passanisi and Jill Ekas to discuss this, and their response <br />was that they went by the staff report and not the Resolution when drawing the Exhibit <br />"A". It is this behavior that explains the discrepancy. It was my contention that the <br />Resolution is Policy and would take precedent over the staff report? Staff would not <br />acknowledge the Resolution, even Paragraph "1" as I read it before them in their office. <br />Tom Passanisi did not even acknowledge a 1996 Parcel Map which he gave me 8 years <br />ago (enclosed) showing the paved section and dirt road. <br /> <br />I've spoken with Vice Mayor Barbara Pierce and Former Mayor and Council Member Jim <br />Hartnett for guidance, henceforth this letter. I'd like to resolve this, and would appreciate <br />it if you can look into this and get back to me in the next couple of weeks, hopefully <br />before the next October 25th Council Meeting. I will be happy to speak in front of the <br />Council ifnecessary. If you have any questions, please feel ftee to contact me at (650) <br />430-4131. <br /> <br />Sin~"1Jy" / I <br />JL&L./.~uvl'4r <br /> <br />Scott Sweeney v <br /> <br />Enclosures: <br />Resolution #14111, 1996 Parcel Map, drainage agreement, as-built drawings, lot pictures, <br />and storm drain pictures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.