My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-02-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 10:02:58 AM
Creation date
2/24/2005 3:17:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /><8,D-3'2- <br /> <br />for Laurel Way development. He stated that parcels to the east of the dash shown on the <br />map presented would not require an EIR due to several findin~s. Mainly, the parcels are <br />easier to develop, not as steep grades exist, and more utilities exist. ~arcels to the west <br />of the dash on the map, would require an EIR because they lack some of the infrastructure, <br />require additional roaãway improvements such as retaining walls. Mr. Passanisi stated the <br />recommendation is that Council make the findings included in the staff report; uphold the <br />appeal subject to the conditions in the report. AdditionalLy, Council should adopt the new <br />policy regarding development on Laurel Way. In order to be consistent in the policy, if <br />adopted by the Council, staff will notify the owner of 3726 LaureL Way, immediately west <br />of the dashed line to inform the owner. Currently, the conditions of approval for 3726 <br />Laurel Way state that they must contribute to an EIR and the new policy would eliminate <br />that requirement. <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br /> <br />Lynda Brouchoud, applicant, stated she is in agreement with the staff report, <br />recommendations and 14 conditions. Particularly, she thanked staff for the hard work, <br />responsiveness and diligence in returning the item back to Council for consideration. <br /> <br />Joseph A. Hanson, stated that several of the people were not notified of this meeting. He <br />stated he is concerned about the people further down the hill from the vacant lot on <br />GLenwood and another area covered by the label on the map. He stated those lots will get <br />the runoff from the development and continued to describe the .existing conditions in the <br />area. <br /> <br />M/S Claire/Hartnett to approve the findings accompanying the staff report granting the <br />appeal and approve conditions 1-14 described in the staff report relating to the architectural <br />permit. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />M/S Claire/Ira to restate policy for Laurel Way specifying those lots that require an EIR and <br />those that do not per the attached map; MINUTE ORDER 0O-36S <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 14111 RESTATING POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPMENT <br />OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY ON LAUREL WAY IN THE <br />CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; <br /> <br />&ti <br /> <br />The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote. <br /> <br />B. Red <br /> <br /> <br />ores Transportation Improvement District Issuance of Bonds: (505) <br /> <br />Financial Services Direc nty explained that the documents and agreement will enable <br />the City to issue up to $5,500, of bonds to finance the first phase of improvement <br />for the Redwood Shores Improvement 01' e stated the financiaL responsibility for the <br /> <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 294 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.