Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. A - b <br /> <br />procedures, the City anticipates that the distance of the equipment from the adjacent <br />properties and publicly accessible areas, will effectively mitigate equipment noise and <br />vibration to an insignificant level. Furthermore, the proposed equipment cabinets will be <br />located within an enclosure, which will serve to further minimize the visual and noise <br />impacts to the adjacent properties. <br /> <br />Aesthetics: <br />The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviewed the proposed project and made <br />recommendations to ensure that the visual impacts associated with the proposed project <br />are minimized to the extent possible. The proposed design along with the incorporation of <br />the conditions of approval will adequately screen the proposed antennas within a new <br />church steeple, which will be constructed in an architectural style consistent with the <br />existing church building. (Please refer to Attachment #4, photo simulations). <br /> <br />Radiation: <br />As previously mentioned radiation associated with wireless communication installations is <br />subject to review by the Federal Communications Commission's (F.C.C.) Wireless <br />Telecommunications Bureau and not the City of Redwood City. However, conditions <br />related to radiation were provided in the Notice of Official Action to ensure that the public <br />had access to this information. <br /> <br />The proposed radiation levels are well within the allowable limits as set by the FCC per the <br />applicant's RF report. When combined the radiation level of the existing Verizon and <br />proposed AT&T facilities would represent 1 % of the existing standard for general <br />population uncontrolled exposure. Conditions of approval associated with this project <br />ensure that the installation and operation of the proposed facility is in compliance with the <br />F.C.C.'s requirements. <br /> <br />The appellant's letter made mention of "health reasons stemming from the constant <br />radiation" associated with the proposed application. However, as previously mentioned, <br />the City does not have the ability to regulate the radiation levels associated with proposed <br />application if it is in compliance with the F.C.C's requirements. More specifically, the <br />Telecommunications Act of 1996 contains provisions relating to the Federal jurisdiction to <br />regulate human exposure to RF emissions from certain transmitting devices. In particular, <br />, Section 704 of the Act states that, "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof <br />may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service <br />facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the <br />extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such <br />emissions.',1 As such, the City cannot take action on this item as it relates to radiation. <br /> <br />Administrative Process/Record: <br />The appellant's letter made reference to the "violation of contract" Based on testimony <br />received at the public hearing and subsequent communications with the appellants, staff <br />believes this statement refers to conditions of approval that were established as a part of <br />the February 20, 2003 Notice of Official Action which gave approval for the Verizon <br />Wireless application. <br /> <br />Condition #10 stated, "No additional communications equipment shall be allowed on the <br /> <br />1 Federal Communications Commission's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau website www.fcc.QOV <br /> <br />2/28/05 <br /> <br />6 <br />