Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.3A~/lo <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT III <br /> <br />Plamlng Cost Rec:øvøry Palicy <br /> <br />Possible Ma <br /> <br />p <br /> <br />In 2004-05 <br /> <br />Pro ct <br />General Plan and Zoning amendments and Precise Plan for <br />Se H I <br />Planned Communi Permit - First Phase Kal8ør <br />Planned Communit Permit - First Phase Martna Shena <br />Ce 12 site General Plan and Zonin Amendment <br />Planned Communi Permit for Market Rate Housl DovIInIovvn <br />Precise Plan of WoodsidelBrœdMI <br />Precise Plan of MId-Point SouIh Ca <br />Costco EIR <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />Hours <br /> <br />520 $ <br />312 $ <br />312 $ <br />312 $ <br />416 $ <br />416 $ <br />416 $ <br />208 $ <br />2 912 $ <br /> <br />TaIBI <br /> <br />77 ,844 <br />46,706 <br />46,706 <br />46,706 <br />62,275 <br />62,275 <br />62,275 <br />31,138 <br />435 926 <br /> <br />Conclusion <br />The sub-committee recommends this Planning Cost Recovery Policy, not only because <br />it will enable us to charge the true cost for service; but also because a well developed <br />and implemented charge system will provide applicants with a much stronger incentive <br />to submit complete applications. Most of our neighbors have implemented a deposit <br />system similar to this or have adjusted their fee schedules to seek to recover the true <br />cost of providing plan review services. In addition, the deposit system is already in use <br />in Redwood City. The City's Engineering Division has been using a deposit system for <br />the last decade or longer and for much larger cost items than Planning is likely to see. <br />This routinely occurs without any controversy. <br /> <br />Finally, if adopted by Council, staff will monitor this new policy and recommend <br />refinements if necessary. Charges under this Policy will be reviewed annually and <br />adjusted if necessary, as part of the annual budget review. <br /> <br />AI 11-4 <br />