Laserfiche WebLink
<br />fJ. A ~ t J <br /> <br />CAliFORNIA lEADS AGAIN WITH NEW E-WASTE RECYCliNG WEBSITE <br /> <br />Califomia racked up another first this week when <br />the California Integrated Waste Management Board <br />and the State Department of Toxic Substances <br />Control unveiled their new, joint effort to promote <br />recycling of electronic waste - eRecycle.org. The <br />new website prCNides virtually everything consumers, <br />retailers, manufacturers, collectors and the media <br />need to know about Cafifomia's new e-waste recycling <br />law, including how and where to safely recycle old <br />televisions, computer tenninals and other covered <br />electronic products. The League has enthusiastically <br />joined as a Govemment Partner to help promote the <br />eRecycle.org website. <br /> <br />SB 20, authored by fonner Senator Byron Sher, <br />established California's e-waste program, the first in <br />the nation. Starting January 1, 2005, Califomia <br />consumers will pay a small fee (between $6.00 to <br />$10.00, depending upon the screen size) when they <br />purchase electronic equipment covered under the <br />program, including most lV's, computer monitors and <br />laptops. This fee will be used to reimburse approved <br />businesses, non-profits or local govemments who <br />apply to be collectors or recyclers and who agree to <br />provide free and convenient recycling opportunities <br />for the covered materials. Most local govemments will <br />opt to become approved collectors, generally in <br />conjunction with their household hazardous waste <br />event programs. <br /> <br />The Waste Board and DTSC are working with <br />Earth Communications Office (ECO), a nationally <br />recognized environmental organization, to promote <br />eRecycle.org. ECO has created public service <br />announcements featuring celebrities that will begin <br />playing statewide soon as part of a statewide pubfic <br />service media campaign on radio and television. <br /> <br />Cities wishing information about e-waste recycfing <br />opportunities should visit eRecycle.org. Information <br />on how to become a collector, reimbursement rates, <br />collector obligations and restrictions, a fist of ap- <br />proved collectors and recyclers sorted by county, as <br />well as basic information about the law and e-waste is <br />also included on the site. We recommend exploring <br />the myriad of resources on the website. Specifically, <br />the following links with information can be of particular <br />help to cities. <br /> <br />Artwork for point-of-purchase announce- <br />ments: httD:/IeRecvcle.oralPOP.htm <br /> <br />Banner ads for use on city websites: <br />VNIW. eRecvcle. oralbanners. htm <br /> <br />Information for residents on local recycling <br />opportunities at VNIW.eRecvcle.oralsearch.asD. <br /> <br />The League congratulates the Waste Board and <br />DTSC for their leadership in developing <br />eRecycle.org. <br /> <br />..........~........ <br /> <br />SIDEWALK LIABILITY: IMPORTANT <br />VICTORY FOR CITIES <br /> <br />On December 1&', 2004, the court of appeal <br />(sixth district) handed down its decision in Gonzales v. <br />City of San Jose. In the case, the plaintiff was injured <br />in a trip and fall accident on a city owned sidewalk. <br />Both the city and the individual owning the property <br />adjacent to and abutting the sidewalk were sued. <br />The injured party and the city both argued that the <br />property owner could be held liable pursuant to a city <br />ordinance that makes owners of property abutting city <br />owned sidewalks liable to those injured as a result of <br />unsafe conditions on the sidewalks. The property <br />owner argued the ordinance was unconstitutional and <br />the trial court agreed. <br /> <br />In reversing the decision, the court of appeal <br />found that the ordinance was constitutional and not <br />preempted by state law. In doing so, the court stated <br />that property owners are "often in the best position to <br />quickly identify and address potentially dangerous <br />conditions that might occur on the sidewalks.. With- <br />out such an ordinance imposing liability, landowners <br />would have no incentive to maintain adjacent side- <br />walks in a safe condition. <br /> <br />In its ruling, the court emphasized that the ordi- <br />nance did not serve to absolve the city of liability for <br />dangerous conditions on city owned sidewalks in the <br />event the city created the dangerous condition or <br />knew of its existence and failed to remedy it. <br /> <br />On January 11, 2004, the court of appeal certified <br />the opinion for publication. The League thanks <br />Shawn D. Hagerty of Best Best and Krieger for his <br />great work in writing the friend-of-the-court brief and <br />letter in support of publication on behalf of the <br />League. <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Sitenwww.cacities.org <br /> <br />PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 3 <br />