Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 13 <br />interest in downtown, and staff commented that there is great, acute interest from the <br />developer community. Another Council Member agreed with the RFQ process and he <br />described what he would also include as important elements specifically: financial <br />capability, conformance with existing rules, and bonus points for housing and <br />innovation. <br />Public Comment <br />Gita Dev appreciated the Council's discussion and suggested a competition for the RFQ <br />without guidelines to allow for greater creativity. She opined that there are too many <br />cars in downtown to make it a truly pedestrian experience. <br />One Council Member suggested either divorcing the sites or merging them. Mayor Ira <br />believes time is of the essence and he wants to move quickly with this. He wants to set <br />up a Council sub - committee with Council Members Gee and Seybert so this does not <br />linger but gets moved along. Mr. Bell noted that this is a top priority for the City and <br />Council and it will come back to Council within 90 days. He noted that there was <br />agreement on doing some clean -up of the City Charter. <br />Mayor Ira said that the Charter Committee needs to be resurrected to see what other <br />edits will be placed on the ballot. <br />Council consensus was to go with option #2 and pursue an RFQ (Request for <br />Qualifications) process with some Charter clean -up. <br />C. Receive Report and Provide Direction Regarding Proposed Ballot Measures <br />Increasing Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and Business License Tax <br />Recommendation: <br />By motion direct staff to prepare documents necessary to place measures on the <br />November 8, 2011, ballot to increase Redwood City's Transient Occupancy Tax <br />and Business License Tax. MINUTE ORDER #11 -074 <br />Mr. Brian Ponty, Finance Director, presented a report (presentation on file) on the <br />subject of placing two measures on the ballot. Staff will return with resolutions at the <br />June meeting to place this on the ballot. Mr. Ponty noted that public outreach has been <br />done and staff is unaware of any opposition. The Chambers Governmental Relations <br />Committee has recommended approval by the Chambers Board. He provided specifics <br />about the increases. <br />One Council Member wanted to do a lot of outreach to the businesses that are not <br />members of the Chambers. Mayor Ira confirmed that they are aware and will continue <br />to address the other businesses. Another Council Member noted that the dialogue <br />should include small businesses but the real picture needs to be shown as to how little <br />has been raised in the last 17 -years and comparing and contrasting with other <br />communities. This Council Member would also like to have a chart breakdown of what <br />businesses contribute to the General Fund and what that pays for. She reminded <br />everyone that the City cannot use public funds in this cause and that it must be done in <br />their private time. She opined that this is like a Cost of Living adjustment. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD May 23, 2011 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 13 <br />