Laserfiche WebLink
�• �"� <br /> X. Cumulative (2020) Imaact on U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed-Flow La�es. <br /> � Woodside Road to Marsh Road Seament — AM Peak Hour <br /> Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br /> ali other appr.�ved and pending projects ii+ the vicinity, the Project is expected to <br /> increase traffic �.•olumes by more than one pe�sent of the U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed- <br /> Flow Lanes, Woodside Road to Marsh Road segmenYs capacity during the AM peak <br /> hour, a period during which traffic volume would already be expected to exceed <br /> capacity on this segment even absent the addition of Project-generated tra�c (Impact <br /> 7-23). <br /> Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a <br /> comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation <br /> 7-23). <br /> Findings: Mitigation 7-23 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate <br /> Impact 7-23. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would <br /> require the addition of another southbound through lane to the freeway segment, which <br /> is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from <br /> multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources <br /> beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the <br /> cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. <br /> -- Y. Cumulative 12020'i Impact on Westbound SR 84. Countv Line to <br /> Universitv Avenue and Universitv Avenue to Willow Road Seaments <br /> — AM Peak Hour <br /> Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br /> all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the Project is expected to <br /> increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of capacity on Westbound SR 84, <br /> County Line to University Avenue and University Avenue to Willow Road during the AM <br /> peak hour, a period during which traffic volume would already be expected to exceed <br /> capacity on these segments even absent the addition of Project-generated traffic <br /> (Impact 7-24). <br /> Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a <br /> comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation <br /> 7-24). <br /> Findings; Mitigation 7-24 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate <br /> impact 7-24. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would <br /> require the addition of another westbound through lane to both freeway segments, <br /> which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals <br /> from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources <br /> beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the <br /> cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. <br /> 1289\02N 79278.2 18 <br /> Ariy/ResWReso.1470 <br /> 052004 <br />