Laserfiche WebLink
�A-4� <br /> Z. Cumulative (2020) Impact on U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed-Flow Lanes. <br /> �� SR 92 to Whipple Road Seament — PM Peak Hour <br /> Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br /> all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the Project is expected to <br /> increase traffic volurr�es by more tt:an one percent of capacity on U.S. 101 Southbound <br /> Mixed-Flow Lanes, SR 92 to Whipple Road segment during the PM peak hour, a period <br /> during which traffic volume would already be expected to exceed capacity on tli'is <br /> segment even absent the addition of Project-generated traffic (Impact 7-25). <br /> Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a <br /> comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation <br /> 7-25). <br /> Findings: Mitigation 7-25 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate <br /> Impact 7-25. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would <br /> require the addition of another southbound through lane to this freeway segment, which <br /> is not feasible because this freeway widening would require mut6ple approvals from <br /> multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources <br /> beyond the capacity �f any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the <br /> cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. <br /> AA. Cumulative (2020) Impact on U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed-Flow Lanes. <br /> - Whipple Avenue to WoorJside Road and Woodside Road to Marsh <br /> -- Road Seqments — PM Peak Hour <br /> Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br /> all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the Project is expected to <br /> increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of capacity on U.S. 101 Southbound <br /> Mixed-Flow Lanes, Whipple Avenue to Roadside Road and Woodside Road to Marsh <br /> Road segments, during the PM peak hour, a period during which traffic volume would <br /> already be expected to exceed capacity on these segments even absent the addition of <br /> Project-generated traffic (Impact 7-26). <br /> Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and imptement a <br /> comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation <br /> 7-26). <br /> Findings: Mitigation 7-26 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate <br /> Impact 7-26. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would <br /> require the addition of another southbound through lane to these freeway segments, <br /> which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals <br /> from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources <br /> beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the <br /> cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. <br /> 1289\0211792782 19 <br /> AttylResWReso.1470 <br /> 052004 <br />