My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/18/2004 11:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/22/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attachment 5. <br /> g • g �./�/ <br /> REDWOOD CITY <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT <br /> DATE: December 16, 2003 AGEND,> ITEM: 4 - <br /> FILE: ZT 2003-07 <br /> PLANNER: Curtis Williams, Contract Planner <br /> Charles Jany, Principal Planner <br /> APPLICANT: CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br /> LOCATION: Citywide <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance <br /> related to Nonconforming Lots, Uses, Structures, and Pa�king. <br /> STAFF RECOMAr�ENDATION: Find that the proposed Zoning Ordinance <br /> amendments are in the public interest and recommend approval of the subject <br /> amendments to the City Council. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING: Yes NO. OF NOTICES MAILED: NA <br /> LEGAL NOTICE: published on December 6, <br /> 2003 <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The current Chapter 33 of the Zoning Code governs development of sites which <br /> contain nonconforming uses or structures. The term "nonconforming" is <br /> commonly defined as pertaining to uses and structures that legally existed prior <br /> to the established current zoning regulations or prior to incorporation into the <br /> City. Illegal uses or structures are not considered "nonconforming" as they were <br /> not legally established. <br /> Many of the current provisions of Chapter 33 are not clear to staff and the public, <br /> and some provisions, such as for amortization (removal) of nonconforming uses <br /> and structures, have never been applied. Additionally, nonconforming parking is <br /> not adequately addressed in the Code, creating ambiguous circumstances for <br /> staff in reviewing proposals with nonconforming parking. Nonconforming lots are <br /> also not clearly addressed, except in particular districts. <br /> The City has contracted with, Curtis Williams, a local planning consultant, to <br /> review these provisions, compare with the regulations of other cities, analyze <br /> options to address the current concerns, and work with staff to develop proposed <br /> revisions to current language. Mr. Williams also coordinated his review with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.