My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-03-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/18/2004 11:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/22/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� ___ <br /> g.�-43 <br /> � Nonconforming Structures - Proposed Revisions: <br /> ➢ Enlarge (if nonconforming use) with Use Permit and findings <br /> ➢ Enlarge (if conforming use) if new portion complies <br /> . ➢_ Repair okay I; not more than 70% of floor are�over 5 years _ <br /> ➢ Replacement c'< if destroyed, except for nonresidential with nonconforming use <br /> �• ➢ Replacement n�t allowed for voluntary demolition, except wkh Use Permit and - <br /> findings <br /> ➢ Deletes requirements for amortization (removal) <br /> Nonconforming Parking (examples were shown of the following): <br /> ➢ Substandard parking provided for medical/dental offices <br /> ➢ Homes with one or no parking and/or which do not meet covered parking <br /> requirements <br /> ➢ Multi-family with inadequate parking <br /> Nonconforming Parking — Proposed Revisions <br /> ➢ Nonresidential uses require Use Permit and finding of no impacts <br /> ➢ Multi-family uses must comply with curcent parking standards <br /> ➢ Single-family with inadequate number of spaces may expand, limited to 3 bedrooms <br /> and 2,000 SF inaximum <br /> ➢ Single-family with adequate number of spaces may expand <br /> Miscellaneous Nonconforming Issues (examples were shown of the following) <br /> ➢ A parcel with less than the required lot width <br /> ➢ A fence that exceeds the allowable height around a house <br /> ➢ A detached garage constructed within the front, rear or side yard setback <br /> Miscellaneous Issues — Proposed Revisions <br /> ➢ Nonconforming lots allowed to be developed, subject to compliance with other <br /> . regulations <br /> ➢ Nonconforming fences allowed to remain (similar to other structures) <br /> ➢ Nonconforming accessory buildings allowed to be rebuilt <br /> ➢ No change to sign provisions (Ch. 3). <br /> General Plan Confortnance <br /> ➢ Revisions are consistent with Plan land uses and policies <br /> ➢ Allows continuation only of legally established uses <br /> ➢ Encourage incremental compliance with General Plan land uses <br /> Environmental Review (CEQA) <br /> � Categorical Exemption <br /> Class 5—"minor alterations to land use limitations" <br /> ➢ No changes to land use or density <br /> Staff Recommendations <br /> ➢ Find ordinance amendments are in the public interest and that they are in <br /> conformance to the Generai Plan <br /> ➢ Recommend approval of amendments to City Council <br /> � Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.