Laserfiche WebLink
City of Redwood City Recycled W ater Task Force Report Marc�, 200�4 ^� <br /> natural turf. In addition, natural turf fields must be periodically taken out of service for <br /> reseeding. The City Parks and Recreation Department estimates that synthetic turf fields are <br /> available for soccer use 14 hours per day (assuming the field is lighted), 360 days per year, while <br /> natural turf fields are available for soccer use an average of 5 hours per day, 275 days pe•- yeaz. <br /> Although life cycle costs for synthetic turf aze higher than those for natural turf; on a per-hour- <br /> of-use basis, synthetic turf is more cost effective. The City Parks and Recreation Department <br /> estimates the 10-year life cycle cost for a 4-acre playing field is $295,000 per year for synthetic <br /> turf and $166,000 per year for natural tur£ However, on a per-hour-of-use basis, these same life <br /> cycle costs aze $59 per hour of play for synthetic turf and $121 per hour of play for natural turf <br /> (based on the usage assumptions in the previous paragraph). Information provided by City staff <br /> regarding natural and synthetic turf construction, maintenance, and life cycle costs is provided in <br /> Attachment 3. <br /> � � . . �' ' � <br /> � -� f �€� � � �� ,,�: <br /> 1 <br /> � � � s � r <br /> w n.�r�.fR�i.v � fi�h d �f' <br /> Natural 166,000 121 <br /> S nthetic 295,000 59 <br /> Manufacturers of synthetic turf predict a 15-yeaz lifespan for their products; thus, the actual life <br /> cycle costs for synthetic turf may be less than those estimated above. <br /> The City Parks and Recreation Department strongly supports replacing natural turf on playing <br /> fields with synthetic turf. <br /> 3.1.3. Existing Groundwater Use <br /> In the course of its investigations, the Task Force leamed that a portion of Sequoia High School <br /> is imgated with groundwater from an existing well. However, the Market Assessment assumed <br /> that this portion of Sequoia High School was irrigated with potable water and estimated this <br /> amount of water to be 71 AF/Y. Alternative E, which is based on the Market Assessment, <br /> induded Sequoia High School among the customers to be served recycled water. Thus, the <br /> 1,946 AF/Y of estimated reduced potable water demand provided by Alternative E included <br /> 71 AF/Y from this portion of Sequoia High School. This 71 AF/Y is also included in the <br /> 290 AF/Y removed from Alternative E when schoolyards, parks, and playgrounds are removed <br /> from the list of recycled water customers. In order to make Altemative TF comparable to <br /> Altemative E, this 71 AF/Y must also be included as reduced potable water demand under <br /> Altemative TF. <br /> Part of the portion of Sequoia High School at issue has been converted to synthetic turf. <br /> Accordingly, of the estimated 71 AF/Y of potable water demand attributed to this portion of <br /> Sequoia High School, 14 AF/Y is accounted for under the synthetic turf category of <br /> Altemative TF (see Table 1). The remaining 57 AF/Y is included in this existing groundwater <br /> use category. <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />