My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-04-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-04-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:07:06 PM
Creation date
4/23/2004 8:27:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/26/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
���-2� O <br /> District, despite the increased intensity, can be compatible with development in an <br /> adjacent IP Zoning District. <br /> The predominate land use and development pattem on the Chesapeake Drive <br /> peninsula is low-rise buildings for office and R&D uses. Seaport Center, built-out in <br /> the m�d-1980s, is characterized by one and two-story buildings with surface <br /> parking and signi �cant landscaping. Over the years, a wide-range of tenants have <br /> located i�� this deve:lopment, but they have been typically associated with the high <br /> tech industry, including biotech and electronic hardware and software developers. <br /> Perclose, which designs and manufactures heart stints, is currently located in the <br /> Seaport Center development. Perclose is a representative example of the type of <br /> businesses that locate in this office park. Perclose was acquired by Abbott <br /> Laboratories several years ago and Abbott plans to relocate Perclose into the <br /> Phase 1 portion of their proposed new campus. The R&D and manufacturing uses <br /> that would occur on the Abbott campus are compatible with the types of uses <br /> already being conducted in Seaport Plaza. <br /> Attachment 1 includes a draft ordinance for the Zoning Map Amendment from the GI <br /> to the IR Zoning District. Staff recommends the Zoning Map Amendment based on <br /> the following considerations: <br /> ■ Consistency with the General Plan Land Use designation <br /> ■ Lack of viability as "Port Priority" use per BCDC <br /> ■ Compatibility with the adjacent Industrial Park Zoning District <br /> ■ Compatibility of the allowed uses with the existing adjacent land uses <br /> • Completion of the R&D campus sryle development of the peninsula of land <br /> defined by Redwood Creek and the San Francisco Bay with access from <br /> Chesapeake Drive <br /> ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT: The proposed project includes 541,077 square <br /> feet of gross floor area for the Abbott Laboratories campus buildings and 10,000 <br /> square feet of floor area for the Marine Science Institute building on a 17.74 acre <br /> (772,750 square foot) site area. The total floor area is thus proposed to be <br /> 551,077 which is 10,000 square feet, or 1.3%, over the 70% floor area ratio limit <br /> in the IR Zoning District. Abbott seeks a Zoning Text Amendment to allow a floor <br /> area ratio (FAR) exemption to accommodate the additional area. <br /> Child Care and Educational Facilities Text Amendment: The applicanYs <br /> proposed Zoning Text Amendment would allow an FAR exemption of up to two <br /> percent (2%) FAR or 15,000 square feet, whichever is less, for floor area <br /> permanently dedicated either as a child care facility or as an independent <br /> educationa! non-profit facility open to the public. Attachment 2 includes the draft <br /> ordinance for this proposal. As drafted, the proposal would only apply to large <br /> developments with site areas greater than ten (10) acres located in the IR Zoning <br /> District. The Planning Commission would have discretion over granting an FAR <br /> exemption based on findings related to site design. <br /> The Marine Science Institute (MSI) proposed in Phase 1, as well as the child <br /> care center proposed in Phase 3 could both qualify for this exemption. However, <br /> Abbott's intention is to obtain an exemption specifically for MSI. The applicant <br /> has not proposed to obtain additional floor area for the R&D buildings based on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.